Search for: "Pitts v. State"
Results 161 - 180
of 312
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
6 Pitt. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
Pallin v. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 10:42 am
See Pitts v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:22 am
Pitts v. [read post]
1 Apr 2012, 11:00 pm
Secretary of State for the Home Department v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:52 am
That will simply not be acceptable.simply not be acceptable.” Research & resources New publications ‘Freedom of Information and the seven year itch’ – by Timothy Pitt-Payne QC, 11KBW, a paper at the 11KBW Information law seminar on 15th March 2012. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 12:41 pm
These include: Victoria Beckham v Bauer, where Mrs Beckham commenced proceedings in respect of the publication of a story concerning invented telephone calls and text messages between herself and her husband David Beckham; and Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie v New Group Newspapers, where the couple commenced proceedings against the publisher of News of the World concerning a story which detailed their alleged visit to a divorce lawyer in December 2009 at which time they… [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:45 am
The discretionary function exception is limited, the Court stated, to "basic governmental policy decisions," and they key issue is the difference between design & day-to-day operational decisions v. policy decisions. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 3:07 pm
Pitts v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:18 am
In 85-87 Pitt St., LLC v 85-87 Pitt St. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm
Phelan, 9 F.3d 882, 887 (10th Cir. 1993) (“[a]s a federal court, we are generally reticent to expand state law without clear guidance from its highest court”); Aclys International v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:20 pm
Tri-State Chem., Inc. v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 2:14 am
The process to be followed in Article 8 claims is straightforward, and is summarised by Immigration Judge Pitt in this case at paragraph 15, which mentions the leading case of R (Razgar) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] UKHL 27. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 6:34 am
United States. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 6:43 pm
In Pitts v. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 4:00 am
’[3] On the question of domestic law the Court finds that ‘the law of the United States has been uniform since its founding that corporations can be held liable for the torts committed by their agents. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
The article dissects the legal reasoning of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Kiobel v Royal Dutch Petroleum[1] and argues that the majority simply got it wrong principally by conflating ‘the jurisdictional and cause of action aspects of an ATS suit’. [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 2:00 am
Chip Pitts is a lecturer in law at Stanford Law School. [read post]
4 Dec 2011, 5:07 pm
McGinley’s complaint states that Kotz’s tactics “have caused SEC employees to fear the OIG’s false allegations and retaliations. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 9:57 am
State. standard. [read post]
