Search for: "Plaintiffs" Results 121 - 140 of 160,559
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Sep 2015, 12:07 am by John Diekman
Practice point:  As the order appealed from granted relief to the third-party defendant, against the defendant's third-party plaintiffs, but not against the plaintiff, the plaintiff is not aggrieved by the order appealed from and her appeal must be dismissed.Student note:  Pursuant to CPLR 5511, an aggrieved person is one who asks for relief but that relief is denied in whole or in part, or who opposes another person's request for relief which is… [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:37 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
  The opt-in plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed without prejudice and the  named plaintiffs’ claims were dismissed with prejudice. [read post]
29 Aug 2019, 5:59 pm by dhdlaw
If this seems unfair, consider the opposite possibility — one in which the plaintiff’s recovery was somehow capped at an objective maximum despite their losses being higher than the typical plaintiff. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 10:24 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
That Fourth Circuit decision is overturned.The plaintiffs were anti-abortion protesters. [read post]
7 Jun 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
  The carrier’s counsel noticed a deposition of Plaintiff’s counsel. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm by David Walk
Indeed, the simple message of the case will be this: with outrageous tactics, a plaintiff’s lawyer can turn a 7-1 defense victory into an $8 million plaintiff’s win. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 1:07 pm by By SUSANNE CRAIG
Plaintiffs' lawyers complained that when they cooperate with regulators they often end up with a settlement that hurts their clients, the victims of securities fraud. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:32 pm by Terry Boyd
Another jury has ruled in favor of the plaintiff for millions of dollars according to Reuters. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 12:54 pm by emagraken
Swatridge) the Plaintiff was injured in a 2010 collision. [read post]
19 Dec 2013, 10:03 pm by Doug Austin
Westmore granted in part and denied in part the defendant's request to compel the plaintiff to apply its search terms to his ESI, ordering some of the search terms to be performed, despite the plaintiff’s assertion that the “the application of Boolean searches was unprecedented”. [read post]
23 Aug 2016, 9:53 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
Plaintiff was a drywall subcontractor, and defendant was a general contractor with whom plaintiff had entered into an agreement to perform work on a construction project. [read post]
12 Apr 2009, 6:04 pm
The Defendants moved to compel information pertaining to Plaintiffs’ immigration status and the Court granted Plaintiffs request for a protective order, citing the in terrorem effect such a disclosures would likely have. [read post]
11 Dec 2012, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
As reported yesterday by the Valley News Dispatch, plaintiffs' counsel had sought the order because of "the highly personal and sensitive religious matters involved, the age of the student-Plaintiffs, the (ill will) expressed by the public regarding the Plaintiffs and this case, harassing remarks about the Plaintiffs, and the potential for physical harm." [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 6:10 am by Legal Profession Prof
The statute of limitations ran on a legal malpractice plaintiff, according to a decision of the New York Appellate Division for the Second Judicial Department. ...contrary to the plaintiff's contention, the defendant did not waive its statute of limitations defense,... [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 2:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
We note finally that the court properly directed a verdict in favor of plaintiff on its main claim for unpaid legal services, a claim which, as one abandoned by plaintiff's trustee in BANKRUPTCY, revested in plaintiff at the close of the bankruptcy proceeding (see Dynamics Corp. of Am. v Marine Midland Bank-N.Y., 69 NY2d 191, 195-196 [1987]; Culver v Parsons, 7 AD3d 931, 932 [2004]). [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 7:03 am by Christopher Simon
The manufacturer then asked the court to dismiss the plaintiff’s case based on the plaintiff’s destruction of relevant evidence. [read post]