Search for: "Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2007, 2:58 am
What I found intriguing was that only Scalia -- not Roberts or Alito -- joined Thomas's concurrence: I join the Court's opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:55 pm
Texas (quoting the opinion he co-wrote in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:59 am
The heart of the opinion is this...The principles set forth in the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
I join the Court's opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
Wade, as follows: "I write separately to to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including [Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa v.] [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:23 am
I'm about to be off-line for a while, so you will have to discuss this without me.ADDED: Justice Thomas, joined only by Justice Scalia, concurs, in an opinion that's easy to read in full:I join the Court's opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 11:10 am by Kyle Hawkins
The court of appeals applied the substantial-obstacle test from Hellerstedt and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:18 pm by Eugene Volokh
Thanks to Mike Chittenden for the pointer.UPDATE: I neglected to mention the strongest argument against the decision — that it constitutes a regulation of professional-client speech, where some speech compulsion (as well as some speech restriction) is permitted; compare, for instance, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am by Guest Blogger
  Before getting to the First Amendment, those laws must first surmount the undue burden hurdle of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 7:18 am by Michael Dorf
Holder, 557 U.S. 193 (2009)Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 5:33 am by Guest Blogger
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 571 (2003) (quoting Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 7:06 pm
Wade in the later case of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
Justice Thomas, joined by Justice Scalia, wrote: I join the Court’s opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:20 am by Neil Kinkopf
The Supreme Court had just the month before reaffirmed that precedent by a six-to-three margin in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]