Search for: "Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Casey"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2007, 2:58 am
What I found intriguing was that only Scalia -- not Roberts or Alito -- joined Thomas's concurrence: I join the Court's opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:00 am
Wade (1973) and a subsequent decision, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 2:12 pm
.' [Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
30 Aug 2007, 12:01 am
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 5:00 am
Wade decided in 1973 and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA v. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 5:55 pm
Texas (quoting the opinion he co-wrote in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 8:59 am
The heart of the opinion is this...The principles set forth in the joint opinion in Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 9:45 am
I join the Court's opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:06 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2007, 4:47 pm
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:06 pm
Wade, as follows: "I write separately to to reiterate my view that the Court's abortion jurisprudence, including [Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa v.] [read post]
30 Oct 2021, 12:07 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 4:05 pm
Wade (1973) and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 6:39 am
Referring to Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 3:23 am
I'm about to be off-line for a while, so you will have to discuss this without me.ADDED: Justice Thomas, joined only by Justice Scalia, concurs, in an opinion that's easy to read in full:I join the Court's opinion because it accurately applies current jurisprudence, including Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 11:10 am
The court of appeals applied the substantial-obstacle test from Hellerstedt and Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:18 pm
Thanks to Mike Chittenden for the pointer.UPDATE: I neglected to mention the strongest argument against the decision — that it constitutes a regulation of professional-client speech, where some speech compulsion (as well as some speech restriction) is permitted; compare, for instance, Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 1:48 pm
Texas, 539 U.S. 558, 574 (2003) (quoting Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:30 am
Before getting to the First Amendment, those laws must first surmount the undue burden hurdle of Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 11:03 am
Among the more prominent of those opinions were Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. [read post]
