Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 4,424
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Mar 2009, 2:21 am
Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (No 3) Court of Appeal “Mistakes in a supplier's invoice did not enable the paying party to avoid late payment interest penalties. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 2:11 am
Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs (No 3) [2009] EWCA Civ 97; [2009] WLR (D) 75 “A ‘notice of an amount of the debt’ within the meaning of s4(5) of the Late Payment of Commercial Debt (Interest) Act 1998 did not have to be correct before the court [...] [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am by Steven M. Taber
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Monday, July 26, 2010, in State of North Carolina v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 9:27 am by Legal Talk Network
As the world anxiously watches the nuclear crisis unfold in Japan, there are growing concerns about the safety of nuclear power plants right here in the United States. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 7:46 am by lcampbell@lawbc.com
  EPA states that the draft guidance is intended to “provide guidance on identifying product label claims that are considered to be plant regulator claims” by EPA under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and thereby distinguish claims that would not subject plant biostimulants (PBS) to regulation under FIFRA as plant regulators. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:33 am
BE (Iran) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] EWCA Civ 540; [2008] WLR (D) 159 “An Iranian soldier who had been ordered in peacetime to plant land mines liable to kill or maim innocent civilians, and who had deserted, was entitled to international protection as a refugee since the order constituted a requirement that he commit a grave violation of human rights which could further be characterised as ‘gross’ and ‘an… [read post]
31 May 2020, 10:00 pm
The May 2020 decision is a blow to the Agricultural industry who was hopeful for a similar outcome in Europe to that of the United States Supreme Court here in JEM Ag Supply v Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc., 534 U.S. 124, (2001), litigated by the attorneys here at MVS. [read post]
28 May 2009, 1:25 pm
This is the first air permit issued in the United States for such a plant in over a decade, according to Jefferson Renewable Energy, the project developer. [read post]
24 Mar 2016, 7:20 pm by Patricia Salkin
The petitioner alleged that its members would be harmed by the plant because it would have a negative environmental impact on Stewart State Forest. [read post]