Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2025, 7:15 am
Batterton v. [read post]
8 Jan 2025, 5:22 am
As explained in the US case of Dixie Rose Nursery v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 8:00 am
Zanetich v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm
Anderson (ruling that states could not determine eligibility for federal office), City of Grants Pass v. [read post]
1 Jan 2025, 2:24 pm
In most states, the priestly role has been transformed. [read post]
31 Dec 2024, 5:01 am
From Bell v. [read post]
28 Dec 2024, 8:44 am
The respondent in PepsiCo India Holdings Pvt Ltd v. [read post]
27 Dec 2024, 11:39 am
–Bell v. [read post]
25 Dec 2024, 2:30 pm
Grp., Ltd. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 11:18 am
’” That is how Chief Justice Mike McGrath referred to the Montana constitution’s provision that ensures the citizens of Montana the “right to a clean and healthful environment” and on which he grounded the majority’s opinion in his December 18, 2024, holiday gift to the environment and the 16 youth plaintiffs in Held v. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 10:43 am
That’s the Supreme Court decision that overturned Chevron v. [read post]
16 Dec 2024, 9:16 am
Bonta v. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 1:47 pm
Environmental Protection Agency, granted a plea from three states (as well as several companies and trade groups) to put on hold an EPA rule intended to reduce air pollution from power plants and other industrial facilities. [read post]
11 Dec 2024, 5:01 am
The earliest reference I could find in a case is State of Illinois v. [read post]
10 Dec 2024, 6:16 am
Additionally, the case Yaneth Valderrama v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 4:22 am
Allegedly over lunch at a Japanese restaurant in London, they agreed to form a venture to develop solar power plants in the United States, including upstate New York. [read post]
5 Dec 2024, 7:37 pm
Board of Trustees of Vermilion Township v. [read post]
3 Dec 2024, 5:27 am
China, India, and other nations continue to build new coal-fired power plants, a move out of step with the transformational action needed to avert irreversible, catastrophic climate harm. [read post]
2 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
For example, Knudsen notes that the Supreme Court has addressed the meaning of “waters of the United States” in the Clean Water Act four separate times—most recently in Sackett v. [read post]
1 Dec 2024, 9:05 pm
v=7G_a_lyGvs0.) [read post]