Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 4,463
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 May 2023, 11:43 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
Furthermore, it should not be forgotten that the participating States in the UPC and UPCA agreement are not the same and that, in the case of the UPCA, they are not all EU Member States. [read post]
26 May 2023, 6:15 am by Edgar Chen
The law also specifically bars any Chinese foreign principals from purchasing any real estate whatsoever in the state, with limited exceptions for residential property by those lawfully present in the United States. [read post]
Here, Professor Buzz Thompson, a global expert on water and natural resources who has served as Special Master for the United States Supreme Court in Montana v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 10:41 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
§ 292.1 authorize attorneys to represent noncitizens in a variety of immigration benefits requests, federal statutes and immigration officers often plant barriers that impede effective legal representation.Consider these examples: The Supreme Court will soon decide United States v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 3:22 pm by NARF
State of Alaska, Dept. of Health & Social Serivces, Office of Children's Services (Indian Child Welfare Act) State of Oklahoma v. [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:00 am by Karen Tani
Observing that “[m]edical certification” of disability had “become one of the major paths to public aid in the modern welfare state,” Stone wondered whether policymakers were asking the “concept of disability” to do too much and whether they were sufficiently alert to the concept’s tendency to expand over time.Filed in 1983 and decided by the Supreme Court in 1990, Sullivan v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 9:12 am by The Regulatory Review Staff
May 9, 2022 | Aborting the Right to Abortion | A leaked draft of a Supreme Court opinion turns the national debate over Roe v. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:07 am by Evan George
Then a coalition of states and environmental groups challenged the denial, and the result was the landmark decision Massachusetts v. [read post]