Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 401 - 420
of 4,464
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Nov 2014, 4:50 am
El Paso Marketing, LP v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 7:54 am
Supreme Court reversed the precedent-setting decision in Connecticut v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 9:02 am
Hans v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 5:28 am
The Florida Supreme Court upheld Florida v. [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 9:24 am
The Supreme Court held in 1983 that the Atomic Energy Act preempted safety regulation of nuclear power by States, leaving only economic regulation permissible to the states. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 4:50 am
State, 856 So. 2d 1133, 1138 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003) (citing Benefield v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:47 pm
According to Alaska State Troopers, Rick Ross, 57, Sam Pavala, 49 and Angela Chingliak were returning to Goodnews from the Coastal Villages Seafood plant in Platinum with donated food when tragedy struck. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:56 pm
Bowman v. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
The appellant argued that the VAT was a mandatory inclusion in his price which was state imposed and therefore he was collecting on behalf of the state. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 8:31 am
That happened in Cornwell v. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 3:00 am
United States. [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 10:21 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:28 am
The United States, on behalf of U.S. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm
Ireland ECR [2006] I-4635 (the famous "MOX Plant" case, see our post here) but that case concerned disputes between member States and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice laid down in what is now Article 258 TFEU (ex Article 226 EC) not between investors and States. [read post]
27 Nov 2010, 2:08 pm
Ireland ECR [2006] I-4635 (the famous "MOX Plant" case, see our post here) but that case concerned disputes between member States and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Justice laid down in what is now Article 258 TFEU (ex Article 226 EC) not between investors and States. [read post]
25 Nov 2014, 10:39 am
Circuit Court, leading twenty-one states, the trade group for the power plants, and the trade group for the suppliers of coal to those plants to take the case on to the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 11:50 pm
The stated intent of the Price-Anderson Act was to foster commercial development of nuclear power. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 1:09 pm
Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals – ARCO Shifts from State to Federal and No Vigor for VIMOn June 18, 2020, the court decided the case of Baker, et al. v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
In essence, Murray is claiming that EPA and the states cannot double regulate power plants. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 6:23 am
In essence, Murray is claiming that EPA and the states cannot double regulate power plants. [read post]
