Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 541 - 560 of 4,536
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm by WIMS
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 10:21 am by Frank O'Donnell, Clean Air Watch
http://www.usbr.gov/lc/hooverdam/History/storymain.htmlYou want a little more mundane comparison: Constellation Energy added all needed pollution controls (thanks to Maryland state requirements) to its Brandon Shores coal power plant In a mere 26 months. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 7:34 am by Seth Jaffe
Given EPA’s recent run of defeats in its NSR enforcement initiative, it’s probably breathing a sigh of relief over last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 10:32 am by Joy Waltemath
The employees’ plea that the employer independently violated the state wage law’s “notice” provisions offered them no recourse (Barton v House of Raeford Farms, Inc dba Columbia Farms, Inc, March 11, 2014, Niemeyer, P). [read post]
19 Sep 2021, 6:43 am by Simon Lester
Over on Twitter, lots of people are talking about the recent investment arbitration award in Eco Oro Minerals v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:19 am by Rantanen
  Although Mettler stated that it had no such documents, during trial a Mettler employee admitted that certain documents existed (a production schedule and plant diagram). [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 11:31 am by Lyle Denniston
  The decision, unanimous only in part, blocked state governments and others from going to federal court to file a claim of “public nuisance” in order to get judicial limits imposed on electric power plants’ release of “greenhouse gases” that may warm up the earth. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:00 am
., requires certain employers to provide 60 days' advance notice of a "plant closing" or a "mass layoff" to affected employees and state and local government officials. 29 USCA § 2102(a); Hollowell v. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 6:34 am
  Justice Scalia, writing for the majority, stated that Stone was not the original source of the information that resulted in Rockwell International, now part of aerospace giant Boeing Co., being ordered to pay the government nearly 4.2 million for fraud connected with environmental cleanup at the Rocky Flats plant. [read post]