Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 41 - 60
of 4,399
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2016, 12:16 pm
In the recent case of Lawing v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 10:00 pm
Ag Supply v. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:00 am
., v. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:15 am
In the case of genetically modified plants and... [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 4:00 pm
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:43 am
(See Wlotkowski v. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm
Recently, the issue of whether CWA § 316(b) requires retrofitting closed cycle cooling at existing power plants as a matter of course made it to the Supreme Court, in Entergy v Riverkeeper. [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 8:00 am
A deeply divided United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS), in Michigan v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:42 am
Anna Riddell & Brendan Plant have published Evidence Before the International Court of Justice (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2009). [read post]
20 May 2013, 1:32 pm
Ctr. for Food Safety v. [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:12 am
EME Homer City Generation [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] did not overstep its authority when it issued a regulation limiting power plants' emissions that cross state lines. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:57 am
The rules are a reaction to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 9:32 pm
The AEP v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
EME Homer City Generation [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court is considering the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] under the Clean Air Act [text, PDF] to issue a regulation limiting power plants' emissions that cross state lines. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:27 pm
In response, a number of states rejected the CAMR rule and adopted state programs that established control requirements for every coal plant within their borders. [read post]
25 Oct 2014, 9:06 pm
In Allen v. [read post]
9 Jul 2010, 11:43 am
(See Wlotkowski v. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:37 pm
A state authority may choose to invest in a breeding programme for reasons of public interest but at some point needs to determine whether to claim the legal rights on the variety or to allow a private entity to protect and own the plant variety protection, as in this case. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:04 am
Ashe County v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 8:56 pm
" United States v. [read post]
