Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 4,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Oct 2011, 12:18 pm by Prof. Coplan, Karl S.
Recently, the issue of whether CWA § 316(b) requires retrofitting closed cycle cooling at existing power plants as a matter of course made it to the Supreme Court, in Entergy v Riverkeeper. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 5:42 am
Anna Riddell & Brendan Plant have published Evidence Before the International Court of Justice (British Institute of International and Comparative Law 2009). [read post]
29 Apr 2014, 9:12 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
EME Homer City Generation [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] did not overstep its authority when it issued a regulation limiting power plants' emissions that cross state lines. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:11 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
EME Homer City Generation [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court is considering the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] under the Clean Air Act [text, PDF] to issue a regulation limiting power plants' emissions that cross state lines. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 6:27 pm
  In response, a number of states rejected the CAMR rule and adopted state programs that established control requirements for every coal plant within their borders. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:37 pm
A state authority may choose to invest in a breeding programme for reasons of public interest but at some point needs to determine whether to claim the legal rights on the variety or to allow a private entity to protect and own the plant variety protection, as in this case. [read post]