Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 41 - 60 of 4,548
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2024, 6:06 am by Melanie O'Brien
The ICJ CERD Cases Two cases brought under the Convention on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), Armenia v Azerbaijan and Azerbaijan v Armenia, are relevant, both of which center on Nagorno-Karabakh. [read post]
31 May 2024, 5:55 am by Yousuf Syed Khan
The denial of fuel, in particular, may be said to have rendered useless healthcare facilities (e.g., the Turkish-Palestinian Friendship hospital south of Gaza City) as well as desalination plants, which are critical given Gaza’s lack of access to potable water. [read post]
29 May 2024, 6:54 am by Jonathan H. Adler
"The Court's opinion in Northwest Austin thus planted the seeds for Section 5's destruction. [read post]
20 May 2024, 1:07 pm by David Pozen
Schedule I of the CSA imposes a complete criminal ban; schedules II through V allow drugs to be prescribed under certain conditions. [read post]
20 May 2024, 7:24 am by Tom Dannenbaum
Warrants would also provide the focal point for political and legal mobilization in third states, including the United States, making it harder to sustain military aid to Israel. [read post]
19 May 2024, 9:05 pm by The Regulatory Review
Aug 29, 2023 | Could West Virginia v EPA Strengthen State Climate Laws | Scholars argue that a recent Supreme Court decision may bolster state climate lawsuits. [read post]
16 May 2024, 7:46 am by Dan Farber
  The Court struck down Obama’s signature climate regulation, which limited carbon emissions from power plants by requiring states to use cleaner energy sources  There was a reasonable argument that the text of the Clean Air Act authorized this approach. [read post]
12 May 2024, 3:51 am by Annsley Merelle Ward
Timing Rule 262A.3 RoP states that “The Application shall be made at the same time as lodging a document containing the information or evidence and shall provide a copy of the unredacted relevant document and, if applicable, a copy of the redacted document. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
1 May 2024, 9:04 pm by Dan Flynn
It increases state workload and potentially state revenue on an ongoing basis. [read post]