Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 4,496
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2008, 6:27 pm
  In response, a number of states rejected the CAMR rule and adopted state programs that established control requirements for every coal plant within their borders. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 7:11 am by Jaclyn Belczyk
EME Homer City Generation [transcript, PDF; JURIST report] the court is considering the authority of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) [official website] under the Clean Air Act [text, PDF] to issue a regulation limiting power plants' emissions that cross state lines. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:03 pm by Benton Martin, E.D. Mich.
Cortes-Caban, 691 F.3d 1 (1st Cir. 2012), and United States v. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:57 pm by Sean Wajert
The United States District Court for the District of Delaware granted plant’s motion to dismiss, 2021 WL 7209363, and plaintiff appealed. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 8:19 am by Eric Goldman
To the FDA’s credit (and in contraposition to the states besieged by the dairy lobby), it actually studied consumer understanding of plant-based milks. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 11:37 pm
A state authority may choose to invest in a breeding programme for reasons of public interest but at some point needs to determine whether to claim the legal rights on the variety or to allow a private entity to protect and own the plant variety protection, as in this case. [read post]
20 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm by Dena Adler
State regulators and plant operators have additional compliance options to meet the emission limits. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 7:42 am by Sandy Rizzo
Nazarian that the State of Maryland’s actions to secure the development of new power plants by setting the price to be received by a new plant in the PJM market for the [...] [read post]
19 Feb 2008, 7:10 am
 See, California Native Plant Society v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 7:56 am by Richard Frank
And the Supreme Court rejected outright the states’ claim, embraced by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, that the states’ nuisance claim remained viable unless and until the federal government actually adopts regulations limiting greenhouse gas emissions from defendants’ power plants–something that hasn’t happened yet. [read post]