Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 4,531
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2012, 3:52 pm
In Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 12:23 pm
The state planted another defendant in his cell as a "human listening device," even though Ventris’ right to counsel had attached. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 10:51 am
WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:29 pm
Access the Sahu v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 7:11 am
The CPP aimed to effect this shift by setting stringent goals for each state to cut power plant emissions by 2030. [read post]
13 May 2013, 11:00 am
S. 617, 625, and confers on the purchaser, or any subsequent owner, “the right to use [or] sell” the thing as he sees fit, United States v. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 5:50 am
State v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
The court of appeals stated that the citizen suit provision would apply if IEEC had violated a term or condition of the permit, or if IEEC had sought to begin building and operating the power plant without obtaining a permit under SCAQMD’s merged Title V/construction permit system. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 5:24 am
”The case, Alma v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
Ashe County v. [read post]
16 Aug 2007, 11:01 pm
Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2007, 4:31 am
The case is Citizens for Groundwater Protection et al. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 1:17 pm
Moreover, the injunction improperly applied home state law extraterritorially, in direct contradiction to the Supreme Court's decision in International Paper Co. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 12:42 pm
Monsanto v. [read post]
26 Dec 2006, 9:44 am
Complaint Union Brings Suit After Swift RaidsYarrito v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:29 am
Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2008, 10:27 pm
Supreme Court ruling, Massachusetts v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:24 am
The Federal plan, by necessity, is adequate because the plan is but a stricter version of the satisfactory emissions limits already applied by the Plant and implemented throughout the State of New Mexico. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:29 pm
” Urging en banc rehearing, the state argued that the Circuit Court decision conflicts directly with a Supreme Court ruling in 1987 — International Paper Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2008, 4:17 pm
., et al. v. [read post]
