Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 101 - 120 of 4,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 May 2013, 11:00 am by Todd Janzen
S. 617, 625, and confers on the purchaser, or any subsequent owner, “the right to use [or] sell” the thing as he sees fit, United States v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 7:17 pm
 The court of appeals stated that the citizen suit provision would apply if IEEC had violated a term or condition of the permit, or if IEEC had sought to begin building and operating the power plant without obtaining a permit under SCAQMD’s merged Title V/construction permit system. [read post]
27 Jul 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Moreover, the injunction improperly applied home state law extraterritorially, in direct contradiction to the Supreme Court's decision in International Paper Co. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 8:29 am by Allison C. Smith
Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in EME Homer City Generation, L.P. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 9:24 am
The Federal plan, by necessity, is adequate because the plan is but a stricter version of the satisfactory emissions limits already applied by the Plant and implemented throughout the State of New Mexico. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 8:29 pm by Lyle Denniston
” Urging en banc rehearing, the state argued that the Circuit Court decision conflicts directly with a Supreme Court ruling in 1987 — International Paper Co. v. [read post]
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm by Coral Beach
”  One of the biggest problems — which has supported other failures in safety protocols at the plant — is the insistence by plant officials to continue to use paper records, according to the confidential document. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:41 am by Dan Mach
  Under the first alternative, interstate trading of emissions allowances would be prohibited, although trading among power plants within states would continue. [read post]