Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2022, 4:17 pm
” One of the biggest problems — which has supported other failures in safety protocols at the plant — is the insistence by plant officials to continue to use paper records, according to the confidential document. [read post]
Bowman v Monsanto: the US Supreme Court rules on patent exhaustion and replication of patented seeds
14 May 2013, 2:09 pm
Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States delivered its long-awaited judgment in the case of Bowman v Monsanto Co. et Al., unanimously ruling that 'patent exhaustion does not permit a farmer to reproduce patented seeds through planting and harvesting without the patent holder's permission'. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
(North Coast Rivers Alliance, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 7:41 am
Under the first alternative, interstate trading of emissions allowances would be prohibited, although trading among power plants within states would continue. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 2:32 pm
North Carolina v. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2014, 6:31 pm
Supreme Court set out in Travelers Indemnity Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2022, 5:04 pm
(Citing North Coast Rivers Alliance v. [read post]
20 Nov 2006, 10:55 am
United States, No. 05-4472 (7th Cir. 11/20/06):In 1986, Kohler decided to build a plant in Mexico that it estimated would cost... [read post]
7 Jun 2019, 5:59 am
ARKANSAS STATE PLANT BOARD; WALTER “BRUCE” ALFORD; KYLE BALTZ; RUSSELL BLACK; RUSSELL BRAGG; ROBERT CAMPBELL; DR.... [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:30 am
On Friday, the United States Solicitor General urged the court to refuse to hear Exxon Mobil, et al., v. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 6:54 am
As applied to a major modification made to a cycling or peaking — as opposed to a baseload — power plant, a three-judge panel of the US Court Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in United States v. [read post]
13 Apr 2020, 9:47 am
Supreme Court held 5-4 that the Patent and Plant Variety Protection Remedy Clarification Act was unconstitutional. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 9:00 am
Last week, in Maroz v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food & Rural Affairs [2009] EWCA Civ 97 (27 February 2009) Penny & Anor v Digital Structures Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 144 (02 March 2009) Morgan & Anor v Hinton Organics (Wessex) Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 107 (02 March 2009) Court of Appeal (Criminal [...] [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 8:43 am
EPA stated in its proposal that a new coal fired power plant produces roughly 1,800 lbs. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 8:28 pm
Supreme Court hears oral arguments in the only environmental case on its docket this Term: American Electric Power v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:48 pm
The Supreme Court decided West Virginia v. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 7:05 am
For existing plants, the States then implement that requirement by issuing rules restricting emissions from sources within their borders. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:42 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Bizimana, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 414 (02 April 2012) R & R Plant (Peterborough) Ltd v Bailey [2012] EWCA Civ 410 (02 April 2012) AH (Algeria) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 395 (02 April 2012) Du Plessis v Fontgary Leisure Parks Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 409 (02 April 2012) Kazeminy v Siddiqi & Ors… [read post]
