Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 121 - 140 of 4,480
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2023, 6:57 am by Dan Farber
From the environmental perspective, West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm by Chijioke Okorie
In those applications, Bayer represented that the active ingredient in its plant protection product, spirotetramat, was protected by its basic patent. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:05 am by Ryan Mulvey
Animal & Plant Health Inspection Serv. (2d Cir.) [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" So Kentucky's tax on its own coal—leading to its own power plants to buy coal from other states—can't be offset by artificially discounting the cost of in-state coal because it likely violates the dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Here, the company has asserted United States Patent Nos 9,944,945  and 7,838,729. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Wright v Rogers (2022) EWCA Civ 1658 – appeal against committal for breach of order to clear wheelie bins, plants and rubbish from joint entrance way. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm by David Post
[Not the political kind, the real kind, the stuff you get from pigs] The Supreme Court has a pretty interesting, and potentially very important, "dormant commerce clause" case before it this term—National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
In which the Tenth Circuit illustrates the difference between things states may not legally do (which includes interfering with the interstate transportation of hemp) and things states may do without fear of being sued (which, apparently, includes seizing all your hemp plants at the airport). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]