Search for: "Plante v. State"
Results 121 - 140
of 4,480
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Feb 2023, 6:57 am
From the environmental perspective, West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
In those applications, Bayer represented that the active ingredient in its plant protection product, spirotetramat, was protected by its basic patent. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:05 am
Animal & Plant Health Inspection Serv. (2d Cir.) [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:00 am
But in that prior case, Delano Farms Co. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 2:49 pm
"] From Joseph v. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm
" So Kentucky's tax on its own coal—leading to its own power plants to buy coal from other states—can't be offset by artificially discounting the cost of in-state coal because it likely violates the dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:49 am
Here, the company has asserted United States Patent Nos 9,944,945 and 7,838,729. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 12:51 pm
Wright v Rogers (2022) EWCA Civ 1658 – appeal against committal for breach of order to clear wheelie bins, plants and rubbish from joint entrance way. [read post]
6 Feb 2023, 5:50 am
Thus, in State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 9:04 pm
v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 2:09 pm
[Not the political kind, the real kind, the stuff you get from pigs] The Supreme Court has a pretty interesting, and potentially very important, "dormant commerce clause" case before it this term—National Pork Producers Council v. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 8:11 am
For example, the plaintiff in Bulun Bulun v. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 12:30 pm
In which the Tenth Circuit illustrates the difference between things states may not legally do (which includes interfering with the interstate transportation of hemp) and things states may do without fear of being sued (which, apparently, includes seizing all your hemp plants at the airport). [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 10:00 pm
# # #SOURCeJin v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:35 pm
The idea of the illegality doctrine comes from Everet v. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 2:44 pm
Caremark started out as a logical consequence of Smith v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 12:53 pm
” Agency for Health Care Admin. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 2:00 am
Cadena et al v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
Their images should be treated with the same scorn as those depicting Chief Justice Roger Taney, the author of the execrable decision in Dred Scott v. [read post]
