Search for: "Plante v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 4,494
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
 The FPA requires entities seeking to operate a dam, reservoir, or hydroelectric power plant in the United States to secure licensure from the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”). [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 7:14 am by Alan J. Arville
However, such prescribing activities would be limited under the new rules to non-narcotic Schedule III-V controlled substances, a limitation not expressly included in the special registration provisions of the Ryan Haight Act. [read post]
6 Mar 2023, 7:02 am by Kristi L. Wolff and Cristina Ferretti
  It is just this scenario that is at issue in a pending false advertising lawsuit, Finster v. [read post]
5 Mar 2023, 8:19 am by Eric Goldman
To the FDA’s credit (and in contraposition to the states besieged by the dairy lobby), it actually studied consumer understanding of plant-based milks. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
The school lost its accreditation in 1946, and closed.[19] After receiving this degree, Selikoff continued his efforts to return to Scotland, to complete his “triple qualification” for medical licensure in Scotland, which would allow him to sit for the licensing examination in one of the United States. 1943 – 1944. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 3:23 pm by Maggie Pahl
The New York State 2022-2023 Budget[1] amendment QQ updated the State’s approach to freshwater wetlands regulation. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:57 am by Dan Farber
From the environmental perspective, West Virginia v. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm by Chijioke Okorie
In those applications, Bayer represented that the active ingredient in its plant protection product, spirotetramat, was protected by its basic patent. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 5:05 am by Ryan Mulvey
Animal & Plant Health Inspection Serv. (2d Cir.) [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
" So Kentucky's tax on its own coal—leading to its own power plants to buy coal from other states—can't be offset by artificially discounting the cost of in-state coal because it likely violates the dormant Commerce Clause. [read post]
7 Feb 2023, 7:49 am by Dennis Crouch
Here, the company has asserted United States Patent Nos 9,944,945  and 7,838,729. [read post]