Search for: "Pleasant Grove City v. Summum" Results 1 - 20 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2023, 10:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Just as the Texas Department of Motor Vehicles did not design the applied—for specialty license plates in Walker, and Pleasant Grove City did not create the donated monuments in Summum, the District could have simply adopted the posters without alteration, and still the posters would be considered the District's speech. [read post]
31 Jul 2022, 12:33 pm by Patricia Salkin
Although the government speech doctrine has expanded in recent years across cases like Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
These include government acceptance of donated monuments in a public park (Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 10:51 am by Eugene Volokh
In Summum, we emphasized that Pleasant Grove City always selected which monuments it would place in its park (whether or not the government funded those monuments), and it typically took ownership over them. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 12:18 pm by DONALD SCARINCI
Texas Div., Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc., 576 U.S. 200 (2015), and Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
20 Jul 2021, 8:47 am by Rick Garnett
First Amendment types will recall that, back in 2009, the Supreme Court issued a (unanimous) ruling in a case called Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:02 am by Scott Bomboy
He also referenced a 2009 unanimous Supreme Court decision, Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 3:47 pm by Eugene Volokh
And this is so regardless of the references in various Supreme Court decisions to the government's power to engage in "government speech," e.g., in choosing which monuments to put up (Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]