Search for: "Plyler v. Doe" Results 41 - 60 of 120
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jun 2017, 1:45 pm by Immigration Prof
On June 15, 1982, the United States Supreme Court handed down a historic ruling that guaranteed all children access to a free public education from kindergarten to 12th grade, regardless of immigration status. [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 9:25 am by Angelo A. Paparelli
 Yet none but a clairvoyant could have predicted the aftermath on June 15, 1982 when the Supreme Court in Plyler v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:39 am by jleaming@acslaw.org
 Such a claim would be at odds with the traditional approach, as represented, for example, by Chief Justice Burger, joined by Justices White, Rehnquist & O’Connor dissenting in Plyler v. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 3:18 pm by immigrationprof
"Midday" with Dan Rodricks on WYPR's daily public affairs program today featured Professor Michael Olivas, author of No Undocumented Child Left Behind (2011). [read post]
2 Nov 2023, 11:15 am by Unknown
Doe, 457 U.S. 202 (1982) [preprint]- Chapter 10: Commentary on Zadvydas v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 5:00 am by Karen Tani
Westminster: School Desegregation and Mexican American Rights [University of Kansas Press, 2010], and Michael Olivas’s No Undocumented Child Left Behind: Plyler v. [read post]
18 Nov 2018, 9:05 am by Walter Olson
Introduced by Will Baude, Driver guest-posted at the Volokh Conspiracy in September on why the Supreme Court has made a difference; the high-water mark and retreat of student speech rights; corporal punishment; Plyler v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 11:41 pm by Transplanted Lawyer
  Here is how the Plyler majority explained it:As we recognized in De Canas v. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 7:17 pm by Daniel Solove
Garcia No Undocumented Child Left Behind: Plyler v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 10:34 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
” In addition to jeopardizing outcomes in cases such as Loving, Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell, following such guidance in Dobbs would also endanger Plyler v. [read post]