Search for: "Poe v. Ullman" Results 1 - 20 of 29
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Oct 2011, 7:09 pm by David Kopel
Shore, 1979, Rehnquist dissenting).More broadly, as the 2d Justice Harlan wrote in his oft-quoted dissent in Poe v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 6:27 am by JB
Ullman in his dissent. [read post]
20 May 2014, 3:33 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court may interfere with the exercise of that plenary power only to the extent the Constitution requires as held in Poe v Ullman. [read post]
3 Sep 2021, 4:59 pm by Josh Blackman
Indeed, Griswold became necessary after the Supreme Court decided Poe v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 5:16 am
Then ask why your solution justifies the limitation.AND: Here's what Justice Harlan wrote in Poe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2008, 6:06 am
(The canonical citations would be Harlan's dissent in Poe v Ullman, Lawrence v Texas, Justice Powell's plurality in Moore v City of East Cleveland, etc). [read post]
3 May 2009, 9:02 pm
Ullman, in which he espoused the view of substantive due process that would ultimately come to be seen as the best justification for Griswold v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 6:16 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
There are, however, plenty of cases holding that absent a reasonable prospect of government enforcement, there is no standing for (as the Supreme Court cautioned in Poe v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 4:37 am by Michael C. Dorf
As I noted in that earlier essay, a leading opinion--Justice Harlan's dissent (only on jurisdictional grounds) in Poe v. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Justice John Marshall Harlan II in Poe v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
"  He likens it (if I understand his argument) to Justice Harlan's tradition-based methodology of due process in Poe v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 5:48 pm
(Recall that the widely admired Justice Harlan listed homosexuality as obviously a form of immoral conduct that states were entitled to ban in his poe v Ullman dissent). [read post]
10 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Already by 1961, the construction of the Act to exclude otherwise-lawful medical use was so well established that Justice Harlan, dissenting on jurisdictional grounds in Poe v. [read post]