Search for: "Pollard v. United States"
Results 1 - 20
of 35
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 3:06 am
Shortly after the New Year, the Supreme Court of the United States decided Minneci v. [read post]
20 May 2016, 8:39 am
United States, No. 11-1324. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 7:19 am
Pollard (No. 10-1104), the United States Supreme Court held that employees of privately run federal prisons cannot be sued for money damages for violations of constitutional rights. [read post]
16 May 2011, 8:56 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm
The following is a guest post from Deana Pollard Sacks of Texas Southern, who's visiting at Florida State right now. [read post]
Whether police in Florida can legally force you to unlock your cellphone. (FL Supreme Court Update).
28 Apr 2020, 6:25 am
In the case of Pollard v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
Of course, for federal private-prison inmates, suits against the United States directly are out. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 11:23 pm
In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 3:27 pm
The Equal Footing Doctrine, which emerged as early as 1845, see Pollards Lessee v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
Pollard and Ryburn v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:54 am
Indeed, in United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 1:33 pm
And in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
Pollard on Inmate Litigants, a recent paper of mine that appeared in the Akron Law Review. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 2:09 pm
Pollard, which emphasized the availability of state tort remedies—remedies that do not exist in Hernandez). [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm
On Friday, the Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR) reversed the abatement in United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 8:03 am
In the United States analogous legal relationships had led to a devastating Civil War. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 4:00 am
” United States v. [read post]
24 May 2018, 8:37 am
Court of Military Commission Review (CMCR), the intermediate military appellate court responsible for reviewing military commission proceedings, announced that it currently lacks a quorum to decide contested motions in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
United States, a case that presents questions about the relationship between religious speech and political speech for purposes of tax exemptions. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 2:50 pm
C. § 2350(f) was interlocutory); and Pollard v. [read post]
