Search for: "Pool, Appeal of" Results 1 - 20 of 2,964
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2016, 5:05 am by Patricia Salkin
Appellants, who were residents in the neighboring area, appealed the issuance of the building permit for the pool deck. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 12:07 pm by Neumann Law Group
On appeal, the father contended that he raised issues of fact as to the defendants’ duty of care and the dangerousness of the conditions in and around the pool. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 8:12 am by Adam Kielich
  The post New York state Court of Appeals says Starbucks supervisors can share in tip pool appeared first on The Kielich Law Firm. [read post]
5 Apr 2016, 2:03 pm by Chicago Overtime Law Center
The ruling was appealed and the Ninth Circuit Court reversed the lower court’s ruling, saying the DOL’s interpretation of the law had been reasonable. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 10:46 am by Inna Kraner
Due to the expert testimony, the court of appeals affirmed.Case example: Towers of Town Lake Condominium Association, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 6:52 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Trimble, a case from the California Court of Appeal, plaintiff’s five-year-old son drowned in a horrific swimming pool accident. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 5:10 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Egan and Robert Whitman Retail and hospitality employers should perk up at the recent decision (here) by the New York Court of Appeals to affirm Starbucks’ tip pooling policy. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 10:03 pm by Patty Salkin
Petitioners originally brought an action challenging the decision of the zoning board of appeals which granted a variance for a swimming pool and a deck.  [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 7:12 am by John McFarland
The San Antonio Court of Appeals handed down its opinion last week in Strickhausen v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 12:28 pm by Sharifi Firm, PLC
In an appeal taken in a California swimming pool accident lawsuit following the drowning death of a five-year-old boy, the California Court of Appeal affirmed the judgment in favor of the defendants. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 4:55 pm by James Love
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has now heard the en banc arguments in Princo Corp. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2009, 6:46 am
Hawaiian Gardens Casino, the Second District Court of Appeal on January 22, 2009, held: (1) Labor Code section 351 does not prohibit tip pooling in casinos; and (2) Although sections 351 and 450 contain no private right of action, they do serve as predicates for actions under the Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm by David Lillesand
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit ruled today in Center v. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 1:05 pm by David Lillesand
The United State Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit ruled today in Center v. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by Sahara Pynes
  Still pending is an appeal to the Supreme Court in the Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association case as well as a still valid DLSE Opinion Letter from September 8, 2005 that does not include kitchen staff as part of the “chain of service. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 5:46 pm by Denise Gorrell
On February 23, 2016, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals held in Oregon Restaurant and Lodging Association v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 11:17 am by James Hamilton
The pool of hedge funds’ client money held by Lehman Brothers International when it entered bankruptcy administration includes not only segregated monies in segregated accounts but also all identifiable client money in the firm's house accounts, ruled a panel of the UK Court of Appeals, and that such pool should be distributed on a claims basis. [read post]
28 Mar 2007, 3:03 am
NORTH CAROLINA:Death Penalty Appeals Bill Would Expand Pool of Cases ReviewThe state Supreme Court should look at capital murder cases in which akiller receives either the death penalty or life in prison when itexamines whether the sentences are consistent, a House committee saidTuesday.The legislation, approved on a party-line vote of 9-5, would expand thepool of cases justices would be obligated to look at when performingwhat's called a proportionality review. [read post]