Search for: "Poole v. Lowe" Results 1 - 20 of 412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Apr 2009, 2:38 am by Anthony Zaller
 In one type of tip pool, the pool is designed to spread the risk of low tipping patrons among all tipped employees; thus, only tipped employees may participate in tip pools. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:13 am by Charles Sartain
Co-author Brittany Blakey Ammonite Oil and Gas Corporation v. [read post]
29 Mar 2022, 9:01 pm by Florian Mueller
Dusseldorf with its propensity to make ECJ referrals of FRAND issues and a recent decision against the Access Advance pool? [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:49 am by Hayleigh Bosher
In the US, eBay v MercExchange made it more difficult to obtain injunctions for patent infringement. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 6:04 am by Florian Mueller
If an LNG organizes collective hold-out, the cash-flow implications for a SEP holder may be very significant or even substantial.Compared with a scenario in which neither SEP holders nor implementers would cooperate horizontally, implementers merely have an additional option in the form of a license from a pool like Avanci, while SEP holders might feel forced to settle for sub-FRAND royalty rates because of the collective market power of those engaging in concerted hold-out until their… [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 1:18 pm
I don't think I buy the crucial arguments for either side in Jones v. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 10:43 am by Florian Mueller
Even though the MPEG-2 patent pool is not identical to the AVC/H.264 pool, it's possible that Motorola wanted to distance itself from reasonably-priced video codec patent license offers.This new Mitsubishi et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 2:15 pm by Joe Mullin
And the pool is controlled by a large group of competitors with a shared incentive to keep those rates low (lower licensing costs means more devices made means more revenue for pool contributors). [read post]
6 Aug 2021, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
In a 9-7 en banc decision in Bristol Regional Women's Center, P.C. v. [read post]