Search for: "Pooley v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 31
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2008, 9:46 pm
Here is the abstract:In Edwards v. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 6:08 am
Supreme Court in Kewanee Oil Co. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 7:37 am
Further, as Pooley stated, small businesses would not be harmed by the ex parte seizure provisions. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 6:42 pm
Guest post by James Pooley. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 9:51 pm
In addition, James Pooley, Deputy Director General for Patents for the World Intellectual... [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:39 pm
Guest post by James Pooley. [read post]
17 Feb 2017, 5:30 am
Pooley addresses and refutes many of the arguments advanced, particularly in the academy, against the DTSA.On the non-compete side, Kristen Almond published in the Louisiana Law Review an extensive analysis of that State's quirky non-compete law. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 9:51 am
No. 09-6306 Wilson v. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 8:27 am
Al Minor & Assoc v. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 11:40 am
Dane argued for prevailing party Medege, and James Pooley for the loser, with Kimberly N. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 2:48 pm
” In 1995 the Seventh Circuit in Pepsico v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 7:33 am
The Kentucky Supreme Court order in Conway v. [read post]
29 Oct 2013, 4:48 am
Pooley v. [read post]
10 Apr 2016, 12:20 pm
For more information see the IPKat's articles on the DTSA and James Pooley's excellent article in IP Watchdog following the Senate vote. [read post]
2 Aug 2015, 4:01 pm
Being unsure whether allowing exploitation of works without prior permission from the relevant rightholder is permitted, the French Council of State has just sought guidance from the CJEU. [read post]
3 May 2007, 1:11 am
Supreme Court's 2005 Granholm v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 11:04 am
ICU Medical v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 10:00 am
| Google Books legal saga ends | s52 CPDA repeal comes into force 28 July 2016 | The latest Jack Wills v House of Fraser judgment [read post]
17 Mar 2010, 1:28 pm
In London v. [read post]
3 Apr 2016, 7:01 pm
This is where the AmeriKat picks up the tale...James Pooley:The Trade Secrets KingIPKat friend James Pooley addressed the provisions in the EU Trade Secrets Directive and DTSA which state that trade secrets are not intellectual property rights. [read post]
