Search for: "Pope v. Carl"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Aug 2008, 3:00 pm
Court of Appeals ruled on Tuesday, in the case Sierra Club v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 1:23 pm
EPA; the thoughts of Melinda Henneberger are here and those of Carl Pope are here. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:00 am
" In the same vein, Carl Pope comments on Citizens for Huffington Post, pointing out that Chief Justice Roberts' efforts to shape himself as an incrementalist have led to expectations that he will encourage a narrow ruling in the case. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 8:38 pm
” Pope John Paul II After The Home Secretary’s extraordinary performance on Andrew Marr this morning where she set out her cunning plan to bring out guidelines for the judges in relation to the interpretation of Article 8 of The European Convention – enshrined in our law by The Human Rights Act – the sardonic side of my temperament would like to substitute the word ‘government’ in the quote above for ‘freedom’. [read post]
10 May 2016, 5:44 am
” At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger criticizes a recent story in The Washington Post on the Court’s recent decision in Hurst v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 6:50 am
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, Dahlia Lithwick (Slate) and Carl Pope (Sierra Club) on a panel organized by Alliance for Justice at last week’s Netroots Nation to address the growing influence of corporations within the American judicial system, particularly in the Supreme Court. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 9:45 am
Cooper in his October 7, 2021 opinion in C.B. v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 1:57 pm
Thereby, King Vasa ended the power of the Pope over Sweden. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 6:20 am
" (I say unfortunate because it allowed Carl Pope, President of Sierra Club, and others, the opportunity to attack Mr. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 1:00 am
In Girao v. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 4:24 pm
., appellate counsel for the patient’s family in Cronin v. [read post]
23 Dec 2023, 7:16 pm
Not only was the statement wrong in 1993, when the Supreme Court decided the famous Daubert case, it was wrong 20 years later, in 2013, when the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved Diclegis, a combination of doxylamine succinate and pyridoxine hydrochloride, the essential ingredients in Bendectin, for sale in the United States, for pregnant women experiencing nausea and vomiting.[16] The return of Bendectin to the market, although under a different name, was nothing less… [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 6:36 pm
(IIT v. [read post]
27 Mar 2019, 1:00 am
Carl Coleman, Seton Hall University School of Law, Ethical Issues in Managing Vector-Borne Diseases Stacie Kershner, Georgia State University College of Law, Public Health Law and the E-Scooter Epidemic Noah Smith-Drelich, Columbia Law School, Food Tax Substitution Effects B. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
Strangelove" (16) "Flight of the Conchords" (4) "Game Change" (2) "Get Smart" (1) "Gran Torino" (10) "Grey Gardens" (13) "I Shouldn't Be Alive" (4) "Limelight" (3) "Meet the Press" (20) "Moby Dick" (5) "My Dinner with Andre" (34) "Mystery Science Theater" (2) "Project Runway" (78) "Romy and Michele's High School Reunion" (3) "Seinfeld" (72) "Sex and the City" (14) "Slacker" (11) "Slumdog Millionaire" (16) "SNL" (60) "Sopranos" (50) "South Park" (71) "Star Trek" (12) "Star Wars" (25) "Survivor" (50)… [read post]
7 Jul 2018, 12:29 pm
In United States v. [read post]
