Search for: "Pope v. United States" Results 81 - 100 of 265
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2014, 6:56 pm
Trade secrets—which in the United States are controlled by state rather than federal law—generally require that the information is not known, possesses commercial value, and reasonable steps are taken to protect it. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 8:50 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
More recently though, the Court stated in 2014 in Tsilhqot’in Nation v. [read post]
15 Apr 2017, 4:17 am
Following a statement from the Secretariat of State warning against unauthorised use and misuse of the image of Pope Francis, the Secretariat of State has hired a well-known law firm to monitor and repress any unauthorised third-party uses of the image of His Holiness. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 3:35 pm by Simon Lester
Luke Peterson of the Investment Arbitration Reporter describes the case as follows: The U.S. firm had contended that Canada imposed restrictions on the export of logs from Canada to the United States, and that these restrictions obliged the company to sell its products in Canada for less than they could fetch if exported to the United States. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 8:15 am by Jennifer Davis
The United States referred to the principle established by these bulls in the 1823 Supreme Court decision, Johnson vs. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 10:40 am by Juan C. Antúnez
Pope, 485 U.S. 478, 489–91, 108 S.Ct. 1340, 99 L.Ed.2d 565 (1988), the United States Supreme Court held that where a creditor is known or reasonably ascertainable, that creditor’s claim may not be barred merely by publication of the notice to creditors. [read post]
28 Dec 2009, 8:45 am by Adrian P. Thomas
  The Fourth District first reflected on the shifting meanings of the term “limitations” in light of the United States Supreme Court’s opinion in Tulsa Professional Collection Services Inc v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 6:56 pm
Trade secrets—which in the United States are controlled by state rather than federal law—generally require that the information is not known, possesses commercial value, and reasonable steps are taken to protect it. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 6:31 am by JB
" Article II requires the President to take an oath to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
2 May 2014, 5:23 am by Amy Howe
United States, two cases in which the Court recently granted review that could have potential implications for the intersection of criminal law and immigration. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
Pope, 200 P.3d 977, 1001 (Ariz. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 2:04 pm by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
              Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 11:39 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-6086Issue: Whether the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act’s delegation to the Attorney General in 34 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
Cl. 2, Amendments IX, X[1]·      German Basic Law, arts.20-25; 31[2]·      Constitution of South Africa, arts. 1, 2, 39, 146-150[3]·      Indiana Code 1-1-2-1[4]·      Hierarchy of Law in Georgia[5]__________Hierarchy of Law in the United StatesConstitution of the United StatesArticle, § 1All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a… [read post]