Search for: "Popplewell v. State"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm
Popplewell J, referring to Lord Keith’s dictum in Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 (the “Spycatcher” case), decided it was not necessary for the disclosure to cause detriment to BHAM. [read post]
16 May 2010, 9:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am
Lastly, Lord Justice Clark dismissed Popplewell J’s third reason above by stating “I do not regard the validity of my interpretation to be impugned because there is an element of tautology” and “I do not regard his erratic use of the comma as any real guide to meaning. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:34 am
It applied for a summary judgment against the respondent which Popplewell J granted. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:35 am
In a two day hearing at the beginning of October, the Supreme Court heard the case of AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier & Ors focussing on the question of which EU member state has jurisdiction in international tortious claims. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 11:52 am
On 27 November 2020, the UK Supreme Court handed down judgment in the landmark case of Halliburton v Chubb [2020] UKSC 48, which has been keenly awaited by the international arbitration community. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm
On 1 and 2 March 2017 Popplewell J heard an application in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers which raised data protection issues. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:06 am
The facts In this case, an application by Brevan Howard for an interim non-disclosure order against Reuters had been heard and granted by Mr Justice Popplewell in March 2017. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am
If other State law requires information to be furnished in a conspicuous manner, UETA §8 states that you can furnish the information electronically, but must do so in a conspicuous manner. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:47 am
In doing so, the Judge relied on several authorities including the judgment of Popplewell J in Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) v Government of Lao [2013]. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am
Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2017] 1 WLR 3985 (Popplewell J). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 10:43 am
The Court first stated that Charterers’ arguments were an attempt to appeal a finding of fact by ‘dressing it up’ as an issue of law. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm
On 20 July 2017 in the case of Rochester v White, Popplewell J refused to extend the limitation period in a libel action. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
1 Nov 2020, 4:35 pm
In Gorham et al. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm
Judgment was reserved On 27 June 2017 Warby J handed down judgment in the cases of Alsaifi v Amunwa and Alsaifi v Trinity Mirror [2017] EWHC 1444 (QB) and Alsaifi v Amunwa [2017] EWHC 1443 (QB) As we have already mentioned, on 29 and 30 June 2017 the Administrative Court (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J) heard the judicial review application in the case of R (News Media Association) v Press Recognition Panel. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm
On 9 July 2021 the Court of Appeal (Popplewell, Dingemans and Carr LJJ) handed down judgment in the case of Greenstein v Campaign Against Antisemitism [2021] EWCA Civ 1006 (heard 24 June 2021). [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm
On 6 April 2017 Popplewell J handed down judgment in Stunt v Associated Newspapers, ([2017] EWHC 695 (QB)) (heard 1 and 2 March 2017). [read post]
3 May 2020, 4:16 pm
United States The Verge had a piece on a group of Senate Republicans planning to introduce a privacy bill that would regulate the data collected by coronavirus contact tracing apps. [read post]
