Search for: "Popplewell v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 26
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Apr 2017, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
Popplewell J, referring to Lord Keith’s dictum in Attorney-General v Observer Ltd [1990] 1 AC 109 (the “Spycatcher” case), decided it was not necessary for the disclosure to cause detriment to BHAM. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:30 am by Tom Pritchard
Lastly, Lord Justice Clark dismissed Popplewell J’s third reason above by stating “I do not regard the validity of my interpretation to be impugned because there is an element of tautology” and “I do not regard his erratic use of the comma as any real guide to meaning. [read post]
11 Nov 2016, 1:35 am by Dan Bomsztyk
In a two day hearing at the beginning of October, the Supreme Court heard the case of AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier & Ors focussing on the question of which EU member state has jurisdiction in international tortious claims. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
On 1 and 2 March 2017 Popplewell J heard an application in the case of Stunt v Associated Newspapers which raised data protection issues. [read post]
25 May 2015, 7:04 am by Graham Smith
If other State law requires information to be furnished in a conspicuous manner, UETA §8 states that you can furnish the information electronically, but must do so in a conspicuous manner. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:06 am by INFORRM
The facts In this case, an application by Brevan Howard for an interim non-disclosure order against Reuters had been heard and granted by Mr Justice Popplewell in March 2017. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 4:47 am by Brian Cordery
In doing so, the Judge relied on several authorities including the judgment of Popplewell J in Thai-Lao Lignite (Thailand) v Government of Lao [2013]. [read post]
10 Jan 2018, 12:36 am by INFORRM
Stunt v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2017] 1 WLR 3985 (Popplewell J). [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 2:24 am by INFORRM
The Panopticon blog has a post about the decision in W, X, Y and Z v Secretary of State for Health, Secretary of State for the Home Department and British Medical Association [2015] EWCA Civ 1034 concerning the sharing of medical information. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 10:43 am by Alexandra Allan
The Court first stated that Charterers’ arguments were an attempt to appeal a finding of fact by ‘dressing it up’ as an issue of law. [read post]
23 Jul 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 20 July 2017 in the case of Rochester v White, Popplewell J refused to extend the limitation period in a libel action. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm by INFORRM
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was reserved On 27 June 2017 Warby J handed down judgment in the cases of Alsaifi v Amunwa  and Alsaifi v Trinity Mirror  [2017] EWHC 1444 (QB) and Alsaifi v  Amunwa [2017] EWHC 1443 (QB) As we have already mentioned, on 29 and 30 June 2017 the Administrative Court (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J) heard the judicial review application in the case of R (News Media Association) v Press Recognition Panel. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
On 6 April 2017 Popplewell J handed down judgment in Stunt v Associated Newspapers, ([2017] EWHC 695 (QB)) (heard 1 and 2 March 2017). [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:04 pm by INFORRM
On 28 March 2017, Popplewell J handed down judgment in Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters [2017] EWHC 644 (QB). [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
 29 and 30 June 2017 (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J). [read post]
26 Mar 2017, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
Last week in the Courts On 22 and 23 March 2017 Popplewell J heard of an application for an injunction in breach of confidence in the case of Brevan Howard Asset Management v Reuters. [read post]
1 Oct 2017, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
 29 and 30 June 2017 (Rafferty LJ and Popplewell J). [read post]