Search for: "Porter v. State" Results 501 - 520 of 821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2011, 10:01 am by Paralegal Mentor
Carey was put on notice more than once by Judge Paul Crotty of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to keep depositions to a minimum or sanctions would be in the offing. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 6:51 am by randal shaheen
  The US government has filed a civil forfeiture claim against Gibson, United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 6:54 am by Phil
Porter of Andrews Kurth LLP was posted on Monday, July 25, 2011 at The National Law Review. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm by NL
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 1:25 pm by Howard Friedman
Under the recommendation, unless plaintiff pays the filing fee, the complaint in the current case will be dismissed.In Porter v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:32 pm by WSLL
Dodson of Williams, Porter, Day & Neville, P.C., Casper, Wyoming. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 5:50 pm by INFORRM
   On Sunday 12 June 2011 the “Observer” published a powerful piece by Henry Porter about the importance of the phone hacking story, “Can it be that Rupert Murdoch really is above the law now? [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:06 am by Tony Mauro
  The case echoes the dispute involved in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
30 May 2011, 12:23 pm by S2KM Limited
In addition, NSSTA's Legal Committee Update included a summary of a 2011 tax case, Espinoza v. [read post]