Search for: "Post v. Duffy" Results 1 - 20 of 211
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2017, 8:30 pm by Workplace Prof
Christine Duffy (Senior Staff Attorney, ProBono Partnership, photo left) has provided this guest post on Blatt v. [read post]
25 Apr 2008, 12:48 pm
Marcia Coyle of the National Law Journal highlighted work of Professor John Duffy of GWU related to the case Translogic Technology v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:11 am by INFORRM
Dr Duffy also created a chat group on yahoo.com under the name “kasambavictims” and posted its internet address on the Ripoff Report website. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
 This decision followed the same Judge’s ruling in October 2015 that Google was liable for the defamatory content of hyperlinks and snippets referring to the plaintiff (see the Inforrm post on this decision). [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 6:33 am by INFORRM
Dr Duffy also created a chat group on yahoo.com under the name “kasambavictims” and posted its internet address on the Ripoff Report website. [read post]
20 Aug 2016, 1:48 pm by Workplace Prof
Christine Duffy (Senior Staff Attorney, ProBono Partnership, photo left) posted a comment to Marcia's post that I found particularly enlightening, so I phoned her yesterday and asked if I could copy... [read post]
7 Mar 2018, 11:36 am by Workplace Prof
Thanks to Christine Duffy (Senior Staff Attorney, ProBono Partnership) who sent along news that the Sixth Circuit handed down its opinion in EEOC v. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 6:36 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
On March 12, 2013, Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas Judge Arnold New issued a Post-Koken decision on venue in the case of Fish v. [read post]
1 Nov 2019, 7:57 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch We have a more complete post coming on Monday, but wanted to highlight Arthrex v. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 9:14 am
Shannon Duffy, at Law.com reported on Aug. 19, that a settlement agreement in Klein v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 7:00 am by INFORRM
TM argued, relying on what Lord Denning said in Kanda v Government of Malaya [1962] AC 322, 337-338, that it was unfair for an adjudicatory body to receive evidence or representations from one side behind the back of another. [read post]