Search for: "Post v. Supervisors"
Results 41 - 60
of 3,259
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2016, 7:07 am
In this post, I will talk about the individual liability portion of the case. [read post]
21 Dec 2022, 1:14 pm
Fla.), posted today: This action arises from an out-of-district subpoena directed to the Supervisor of Elections for Monroe County, Florida, issued in connection with US Dominion, Inc. et al. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2022, 2:00 am
The post U.S. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 4:58 am
After her direct supervisor, Ka Lam, reported the harassment to Fry’s legal department, the company fired Lam, according to the EEOC. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:29 am
A ten-day suspension without pay recommended after employee is found guilty of refusing to comply with her supervisor’s instructionHuman Resources Administration v Traylor, OATH Index #2162/11 OATH Administrative Law Judge Ingrid M. [read post]
9 Aug 2022, 6:21 am
The post TRIMECHIAH ROGERS v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 2:41 pm
On March 1, 2011, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Staub v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:08 am
On June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Vance v. [read post]
5 Sep 2013, 8:08 am
On June 24, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Vance v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 4:50 am
In Vance v. [read post]
7 Feb 2013, 4:00 am
Considering the “serious nature” of the Supervisor’s misconduct, the court said that the penalty imposed, dismissal, did not shock its sense of fairness, citing Kelly v Safir, 96 NY2d 32 and Berenhaus v Ward, 70 NY2d 436. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 9:27 pm
Palleschi v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:13 pm
In our blog article posted on August 3, 2016, we discussed the growing trend of court jurisdictions throughout the country adopting the cat’s paw causation theory to conclude that employers can be held liable for the discriminatory or retaliatory acts of supervisors and subordinate co-workers. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 12:13 pm
In our blog article posted on August 3, 2016, we discussed the growing trend of court jurisdictions throughout the country adopting the cat’s paw causation theory to conclude that employers can be held liable for the discriminatory or retaliatory acts of supervisors and subordinate co-workers. [read post]
20 Jan 2017, 2:17 pm
The post Friday’s Five: When employers can be liable for supervisor’s conduct appeared first on California Employment Law Report. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 2:52 pm
But the court dismisses one of the posts (directed to the supervisor) as innocuous. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:53 pm
Koziol v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:22 am
(You can read the post here.) [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 9:00 pm
The Proactive Employer ran an interesting blog post on July 17, 2012 which reported on a case where a supervisor had personal liability under a Cat Paw type of case. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 9:01 am
Teixeira Blogger Can Display County Seal in Blog Posts–Rothamel v. [read post]
