Search for: "Powe v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 103
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2015, 6:25 am by Sebastian Brady
On Tuesday, Wells linked to an en banc decision by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:18 am by Adam Klein
As the Court later explained in Baker v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 7:54 am by Anna Christensen
   ABC News quotes University of Texas law professor Lucas Powe, who speculates that the Justices will likely opt not to attend the State of the Union address next year, while Robert Barnes, writing for the Washington Post, points out that each Justice chooses whether to attend the State of the Union address each year (this year, Justices Stevens, Scalia, and Thomas all skipped the speech). [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 6:14 am by Meg Kribble
Partisans captured in the field were to be shot immediately, not treated as POWs. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 12:51 pm by Hanibal Goitom
It declared [[t]he state of] Liberty is in accord with the law of reason, for all men share liberty on the basis of natural law. [read post]
15 Aug 2006, 1:26 am
Hays Parks, Means and Methods of Warfare Michael Matheson, Continuity and Change in the Law of War: 1975 to 2005: Detainees and POWs Dinah PoKempner, The "New" Non-State Actors in International Humanitarian Law Jane E. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 1:18 pm
Indeed, Justice O'Connor's most quoted line in her 2004 plurality opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:13 pm by annalthouse@gmail.com (Ann Althouse)
The book’s endorsement of Lewis’s many national-consensus pronouncements is most egregious in the instance of the Warren Court’s 1961 decision in Mapp v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 11:00 am by James E. Pfander
Rumsfeld (2004) (allowing detention of a U.S. citizen as an enemy combatant) and in Boumediene v. [read post]
12 Apr 2008, 5:32 am
This principle was established by the United States in one of the most dramatic of the post-World War II proceedings, United States v. [read post]