Search for: "Powell v. Lloyd" Results 1 - 20 of 30
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2024, 12:56 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The directors’ and officers’ liability environment is always changing, but 2023 was a particularly eventful year, with important consequences for the D&O insurance marketplace. [read post]
29 May 2022, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
  The work has been comprehensively updated to take in the latest case including Lachaux, Stocker, Serafin, Lloyd v Google, Economou, Wright v Ver, Wright v Granath, Corbyn v Millett, Duchess of Sussex v Associated, and Soriano v Forensic News. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
, heard 15 and 16 June 2021 (Julian Knowles J) Riley v Murray, heard 10 to 12 May 2021 (Nicklin J) Lloyd v Google, heard 28 and 29 April 2021 (UKSC) Kumlin v Jonsson, heard 24 and 25 March 2021 (Julian Knowles J). [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
IPSO has published one ruling and resolution statements since our last Round Up: 05337-19 Cameron v Sunday Mail, 1 Accuracy (2018), 2 Privacy (2018), No breach – after investigation 08392-19 Osinyemi v thisislocallondon.co.uk, 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 08220-19 Osinyemi v mylondon.news, 14 Confidential sources (2019), Resolved – IPSO mediation 08219-19 Osinyemi v yourlocalguardian.co.uk, 14 Confidential sources… [read post]
18 Aug 2019, 9:52 am by Giles Peaker
As per Powell v Dacorum Borough Council (2019) EWCA Civ 23, at (44) (our report) “In my judgment, the previous decisions of the courts on the present subject of the application and working of the PSED, as on all subjects, have to be taken in their context. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 6:08 am
Thomas (Vanderbilt University), on Friday, March 9, 2018 Tags: Board independence, Boards of Directors, Delaware articles, Delaware cases, Delaware law, Disclosure, Fiduciary duties, Hedge funds, In re Revlon, In re Trulia, Management, Merger litigation, Mergers & acquisitions, Settlements, Shareholder activism, Shareholder suits, Shareholder voting, Unocal v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Beydoun, Electing Islamophobia, (March 6, 2016).Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, Fragmented Oversight of Nonprofits in the United States: Does it Work? [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
(Re)Emerging Issues The Seattle/Louisville Decision and the Future of Race-Conscious Programs Philip Tegeler Separate ≠ Equal: Mexican Americans Before Brown v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Mount v Hodder & Staughton Limited, 16 January 2014 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
15 Dec 2013, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Miller v Associated Newspapers, 10 and 11 December 2013 (Maurice Kay, Moore-Bick and Lloyd-Jones LJJ) Kneafsey v Independent Television, 11 December 2013 (Tugendhat J) [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
Powell bars habeas relief if the state fails to raise Stone in the district court, or whether Stone announced a categorical rule that Fourth Amendment claims are not cognizable on habeas review absent a showing that the state prisoner was denied a full and fair opportunity to litigate the issue in state court; (2) whether the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, in relying on studies that were not part of the state court record, conflicts with… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
7 Jul 2013, 12:01 pm by Giles Peaker
Noting that this was found to be compatible with Art 8 in Hounslow London Borough Council v Powell [2011] UKSC 8, Sir Alan Ward also notes that in Yordanova v Bulgaria (Application No. 25446/06, dated 24th April 2012) [our note] the ECtHR said: “However, Article 8 does not impose on Contracting States an obligation to tolerate unlawful land occupation indefinitely…”.Therefore:I conclude that the court must approach the claim made by a private landowner… [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:41 pm
The other day, I was blogging about tags, and somebody asked what are all the tags. [read post]
17 Dec 2012, 2:30 am by INFORRM
On the same day the Court of Appeal (Laws, Tomlinson and McCombe LJJ) will hear the appeal in the case of Waterson v Lloyd. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 5:11 am
For the very sensible reasons explained by the Supreme Court of the United States in Powell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 11:25 pm by J
[Update - Chief has, with his dark arts, found the transcipt.]In Lloyd, Mr Lloyd was a secure tenant of Birmingham. [read post]