Search for: "Powell v. Powell" Results 101 - 120 of 2,106
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2011, 8:45 am
This appeal from the Court of Appeal, where it was known as Salford CC v Mullen [2010] EWCA Civ 336, was heard on 23-24 November and concerns the applicability of ECHR, art 8, to mandatory possession proceedings brought by local authorities in two contexts, namely: introductory tenancies under the Housing Act 1996, Pt V (Frisby [...] [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 8:08 am
As the Fourth Circuit itself noted in yesterday's case of United States v Powell, Earlier this year, in United States v. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 9:30 am by Karen Tani
Jacob, The Gideon TrialsSara Mayeaux, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Before Powell v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 4:25 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
US 7,970,543, titled Predicting tropical cyclone destructive potential by integrated kinetic energy according to the Powell/Reinhold scale, lists as inventors Powell and Reinhold and cites papers to Powell et al. [read post]
21 Nov 2016, 3:30 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Disciplinary actions pursuant to Education Law §3020-a processed consistent with compulsory arbitration standardsPowell v New York City Dept. of Educ, 2016 NY Slip Op 07656, Appellate Division, Second DepartmentEducation Law §3020-a(5) provides for judicial review of an arbitrator's disciplinary determination, made in the course of a disciplinary arbitration as set out in CPLR 7511. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 2:19 pm
In Florida v Powell, the United States Supreme Court ruled that the Police need not stick to a script when providing a suspect with Miranda rights. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 5:25 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
To view a copy of the Appellate Division's decision, please use this link: Powell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 6:52 am by Matt Sundquist
Powell and Hertz Corp. v Friend, and it heard oral argument in Holder v. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:50 am by NL
One of the questions posed as a result of Hounslow LBC v Powell [2011] UKSC 8 [our report here] is what happens if a proportionality argument is raised after a possession order has been made, but before eviction.Powell found that s.89 Housing Act 1980, which limits the time for a stay of possession order to a maximum of 6 weeks, was compatible with Article 8. [read post]