Search for: "Powers v. 31 E 31 LLC" Results 1 - 20 of 212
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Ocean Wind 1 and 2 project cancellations also followed the filing of County of Cape May v. [read post]
8 Oct 2024, 6:34 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
SEMINAL C ASE LAW ON EMPLOYMENT: BORELLO, MARTINEZ, DYNAMEX § 30 Overview § 31 Borello Case § 32 Martinez Case § 33 Dynamex Case §§ 34-39 Reserved PART V. [read post]
25 Sep 2024, 6:06 am by centerforartlaw
It is clear that OMA wants the public to believe the narrative that the institution was a victim to the directors scheming, but it is unbelievable that the museum’s internal power structuring allowed for the director to go unchecked, and to ‘silence’ those who voiced concerns.[13] Attorney Pierce O’Donnell, the aforementioned attorney who is a partial owner of the fakes, is a prominent LA litigator with a history of winning disputes of authenticity in court. [read post]
31 May 2024, 2:08 pm by Ben Sperry
(and its subsidiary Lockton Affinity LLC) and underwriter Chubb Ltd. [read post]
Airgas USA, LLC, Fisher was an operation technician who used power tools, worked with combustible gases, and drove a company vehicle. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 6:08 pm by Guest Author
The Court has turned away each such challenge (most recently in Oil States Energy Services, LLC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 6:00 am by Michelle
Industry Developments SPOTLIGHT: Paze’s Digital Wallet Uses a Bank-Centered Fintech Approach to E-Commerce CheckoutDigital Transactions News – October 24, 2023 Though the official launch of the Paze online wallet from Early Warning Services LLC isn’t slated until 2024, Paze executives are already demonstrating the product. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm by CFM Admin
On July 26, 2023, the SEC proposed new rules aiming to address conflicts of interest associated with the use of predictive data analytics (“PDA”) and other similar AI-powered tools. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit applied general preemption principles to his case, and concluded that New York’s interest-on-escrow law was preempted because it “would exert control over banks’ exercise of th[e] power” to “create and fund escrow accounts. [read post]