Search for: "Powers v. 31 E 31 LLC" Results 101 - 120 of 236
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2021, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
"[116] Turner and Rumsfeld rejected similar claims.[117] Even the district court opinion striking down the specific Florida social media access rules in NetChoice, LLC v. [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 6:55 am by John Elwood
The government argues that the decision below is correct and “th[e] question arises far less often than [Rudisill] suggests. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 1:27 pm
[Page 1:] The plaintiffs, Great Hill Equity Partners IV, LP, Great Hill Investors LLC, Fremont Holdco, Inc., and Bluesnap, Inc. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 9:11 pm by smtaber
If you would like to receive this update in an e-mail delivered to your inbox every Monday, please send an e-mail to with the word “subscribe” in the subject line. [read post]
5 Apr 2021, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
The Referee’s Report The court-appointed Special Referee, attorney Christopher E. [read post]
23 May 2021, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Canadian courts may have seen its first pandemic forum non conveniens decision reported recently, in Kore Meals LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 10:53 am
Code § 36-1-3-6(a) (when a statutory provision requires a power to be exercised in a specific manner, the municipality must exercise the power in that manner).In James Butler v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 10:49 pm
(Copyright Litigation Blog)   US Copyright – Lawsuits and strategic steps Henley, Don – Henley, DeVore file reply briefs in ‘parody’ battle (Copyrights & Campaigns)   US Trademarks 50% successful with jus tertii defense: Golden Temple of Oregon, LLC v Wai Lana Productions, LLC and United Food Imports, Inc v Baroody Imports, Inc (Property, intangible) ‘Fraud and the TTAB: What hath Bose wrought? [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Grove Family, LLC,2 City of Novi v Robert Adell Children’s Funded Trust,3 and Township of Grosse Ile v Grosse Ile Bridge Co.4 Last, the UCPA (the procedural statute applicable to all condemnation actions in Michigan) provides that a condemning agency’s finding of necessity will only be reversed for “abuse of discretion, error of law, or fraud. [read post]