Search for: "Powers v. 31 E 31 LLC" Results 121 - 140 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2011, 12:59 am
No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119, as an unconstitutional exercise of congressional power. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
(Canadian Trademark Blog) CIPO Trademarks Opposition Board revising procedures, effective 31 March 2009 (Daily Dose of IP) (ipblog.ca)   China China patent reform. [read post]
28 Jan 2023, 7:32 am
" (IFC, Environmental, Social, and Governance).The goal oriented policy objectives of ESG have also been underscored by the OECD, one that seeks to recionceive the traditional focus on value maximization grounded in traditional financial analysis to  a more generalized set of public objectives toward which economic actoivity can contribute, on e in which the markers of financial value are made more a function of public good objectives. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 3:34 am by Peter Mahler
Judge Buchwald rejected each contention, finding that the Partnership Agreement’s definition of written instrument encompassed electronic transmission; that the email’s informal sign-off (“Thank you, Ron & Walter”) constituted a valid signature under the federal E-SIGN Act; and that the email’s statement that the Fund will be extended “until 2021” connoted an outside date of December 31, 2021, and therefore constituted a valid amendment… [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 4:48 am by Marie Louise
(Patents Post Grant Blog) District Court N D Illinois: False patent marking requires particular allegations that each defendant marked: Newt LLC v. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 10:00 am
  In a 5-3 opinion (Justice Breyer recused himself) authored by Justice Kennedy,the Court, in Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 11:17 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit applied general preemption principles to his case, and concluded that New York’s interest-on-escrow law was preempted because it “would exert control over banks’ exercise of th[e] power” to “create and fund escrow accounts. [read post]
6 Sep 2021, 5:27 am by Vercammen Law
The Administrator filed an action on October 29, 2019 encaptioned Estate of Sandor v. [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:38 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
Camuso‘s holding is reminiscent of Congel v Malfitano, 31 NY3d 272 [2018]. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am by Joel R. Brandes
Slip Op. 06208 (2d Dept.,2021) the parties stipulation of settlement dated December 31, 2018 which was incorporated in their September 19, 2019 judgment of divorce provided for  joint legal custody of their child, joint decision-making authority, and the defendant having residential custody of the child, subject to the plaintiff’s parental access.. [read post]