Search for: "Powers v. Campbell" Results 61 - 80 of 406
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am by Gary P. Rodrigues
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
26 May 2016, 4:34 pm by INFORRM
 Google had argued that (i) CNIL’s enforcement notice was invalid as it was ‘based on an imprecise and unpredictable legal rule, and not on specific complaints‘ (ii) that CNIL was ‘exceeding its powers by imposing a measure with extraterritorial scope‘, and (iii) that ‘global delisting would represent a disproportionate attack on freedom of expression and information‘. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’  This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
Campbell, 537 U.S. 1042 (2002); see also Schact v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
As such, “tribes possess the common-law immunity traditionally enjoyed by sovereign powers” (Oneida Indian Nation v Phillips, 981 F3d 157, 170 [2d Cir]). [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:21 am by Joy Waltemath
That was the question before the Justices as the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 8:03 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:08 am
J & J Sports states that it is the exclusive domestic commercial distributor of Star Power: Floyd Mayweather, Jr. v. [read post]