Search for: "Powers v. Campbell"
Results 61 - 80
of 528
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2009, 3:52 pm
The Court of Appeal opinion doesn't discuss that aspect of Campbell, but it does indicate that the defendant relied on Gober v. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 4:47 pm
Section 1 – Serious harm A statement is no longer defamatory unless a claimant can show that ‘…its publication has caused or is likely to cause serious harm to [his/her] reputation…’ This section builds on the jurisprudence of Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75 and Thornton v Telegraph Media Group [2010] EWHC 1414 (QB) and is intended to deter trivial claims. [read post]
9 Mar 2020, 4:00 am
Then in 1973 the Supreme Court of Canada case Calder v. [read post]
20 Jan 2023, 3:24 am
The Claimant, Mr Campbell’s, claim was rejected, and he had to seek accommodation under the Housing Act. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 8:02 am
Campbell, 537 U.S. 1042 (2002); see also Schact v. [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am
As such, “tribes possess the common-law immunity traditionally enjoyed by sovereign powers” (Oneida Indian Nation v Phillips, 981 F3d 157, 170 [2d Cir]). [read post]
26 May 2010, 3:33 pm
The issue of application of Illinois punitive damages laws arises with respect to State Farm in large measure because of the recent decision in the matter styled Campbell v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 8:16 am
Campbell is solicitor general of the state of Nebraska. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 6:19 am
Precision Drone LLC v. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am
Campbell v. [read post]
6 Apr 2012, 1:12 pm
Campbell. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:20 pm
The most iconic case about presidential war power, Youngstown Sheet & Tube v. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 8:16 am
Lindke argued that Freed maintained the page as part of his “job duties/powers as City Manager” because he used it to regularly communicate with constituents. [read post]
2 Apr 2018, 7:30 am
Gibbons v. [read post]
23 May 2014, 6:48 am
Student Contributors: Rebecca Campbell and Austin LiPuma [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 6:07 am
For nearly 30 years, the framework for judging fair use cases has been remarkably stable, based on Justice Souter’s masterful opinion for a unanimous Court in Campbell v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 9:07 am
It also goes far beyond municipal bylaws to curb the cosmetic use of pesticides, which were upheld by the Supreme Court in Hudson v. [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 7:21 am
That was the question before the Justices as the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Campbell-Ewald Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 9:40 am
., P.C. v. [read post]
