Search for: "Powers v. Commissioner"
Results 1 - 20
of 2,608
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
This is in the highly anticipated (well, at least for privacy lawyers) decision in the Canada (Privacy Commissioner) v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 7:43 am
Compound interest is payable in restitution Sempra Metals Ltd (formerly Metallgesellschaft Ltd) v Inland Revenue Commissioners and Another “The court had power to make an award of compound interest in a claim for restitution where such an award was necessary to achieve full justice for the claimant. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 2:37 am
Eastenders Cash and Carry plc and another v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2010] EWHC 2797 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 282 “The power of detention contained in s 139(1) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 was not limited to cases in which the goods in question were goods on which duty had not in fact been paid, but also covered cases in which there were reasonable grounds for suspecting that duty might not have been paid on the goods. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:06 am
Regina (Eastenders Cash & Carry plc and another) v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2012] EWCA Civ 15; [2012] WLR (D) 6 “Section 139(1) of the Customs and Excise Management Act 1979 gave customs officers power to detain goods only where they were ‘liable to forfeiture’ in the sense that the relevant facts empowering the court to order forfeiture actually existed; it was not enough that the relevant officer reasonably suspected that such facts… [read post]
11 Sep 2007, 1:28 am
Commissioner has power to delegate conditions Director of Public Prosecutions v Haw Queen’s Bench Divisional Court “The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis could delegate his statutory power to impose conditions on demonstrations in the vicinity of Parliament. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 6:21 am
On 12 March 2014, the Supreme Court gave judgment in the case of R (BSkyB) v Commissioner of Police [2014] UKSC 17. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 3:00 am
Commissioner, T.C. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 7:04 am
An expanded panel has the power to overrule prior three-judge decisions (such as those concerning the patent=eligibility of computer-implemented inventions in Research Affiliates LLC v Commissioner of Patents [2014] FCAFC 150 and Commissioner of Patents v RPL Central Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 177), and its decision will be binding on all Australian courts and tribunals (including the Patent Office), other than the High Court.The nature of the… [read post]
18 May 2012, 2:13 pm
Commissioner and the majority's holding that the U.S. [read post]
13 Sep 2014, 5:31 am
Existing electric power generators and distribution companies sued the commissioners of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities... [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 4:11 am
Concerning the removal and appointment of an individual to the position of Election Commissioner by a county legislatureMatter of Wood v County of Cortland, 2009 NY Slip Op 29069, Decided on February 18, 2009, Supreme Court, Cortland CountyThe general rule is that the power to appoint implies the power to remove. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:14 am
Removal and appointment of an individual to the position of Election Commissioner by a county legislatureMatter of Wood v County of Cortland, 23 Misc 3d 913The general rule is that the power to appoint implies the power to remove. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 4:27 am
In Kniss v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:40 am
But it is an open question whether the Court could ever practically fashion more robust and judicially manageable limits on the spending power The High Court of Australia's decision in Pape v. [read post]
16 Nov 2013, 11:44 am
Commissioner of Income Tax1has cleared the position of the...The post Assessing Officer’s Power to Call for Information appeared first on The Lex-Warrier. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 4:23 pm
Data Protection Commissioner. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 1:54 am
Director of Public Prosecutions v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:09 pm
In his dissent in Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
4 Apr 2016, 4:10 am
In Lloyd v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
It is my view that RFRA is unconstitutional in all of its applications, not simply as applied to state laws, because it violates the separation of powers principle embodied in the Constitution, Article V’s constitutional amendment procedures, and the principle of separation of church and state. [read post]
