Search for: "Powers v. Commissioner" Results 1 - 20 of 1,866
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Supreme Court’s Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 4:19 pm by INFORRM
The principle gets its name from Marcel v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [1992] Ch 225. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 1:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal considers whether the court has jurisdiction to direct members of a charitable company on how to exercise their powers absent breach of fiduciary duty. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 7:28 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Serge Joyal cited the Supreme Court of Canada decision in Canada (Information Commissioner) v. [read post]
26 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
On 1 July 2020 the Irish Court of Appeal handed down judgment in the case of Nowak v Data Protection Commissioner [2020] IECA 175 which dealt with the limits of the concept of “personal data”. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Max Masuda-Farkas
FDA Commissioner Stephen M. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by John Gregory
An overlap of e-signatures and Internet voting presented some legal challenges in Australia, leading to a decision I found problematic in a 2014 case comment on Getup Ltd v Elections Commissioner. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
The UK and US’s Data Access Agreement, due to come into use later this year, is to be overseen by the Investigatory Powers Commissioner Sir Brian Leveson. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 9:40 am by Guest Blogger
  Koppelman has made one, and I will join him – with just a few small differences – here.To assess Koppelman’s claims, I am going to return to Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 8:31 am by Kenneth Propp, Peter Swire
From Edward Snowden to Luxembourg The case, Data Protection Commissioner v. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:30 pm by Christian Schröder
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 12:28 pm by Christian Schröder
Today the European Court of Justice (CJEU) published its highly anticipated judgement in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
16 Jul 2020, 9:17 am by INFORRM
Where the SCCs are not complied with – or cannot be complied with – the national regulatory authorities must suspend or prohibit transfers and the Commission’s competence to draft SCCs does not restrict the powers of national authorities to review compliance in any way. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 10:07 am by Christian Schröder
Tomorrow, July 16, 2020, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) is expected to rule in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 8:37 am by Christian Schröder
Tomorrow, July 16, 2020, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) is expected to rule in the case of Data Protection Commissioner Ireland v Facebook Ireland Limited, Maximillian Schrems, colloquially known as “Schrems 2.0”. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 8:06 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
[emphasis added] In enacting the Act, Parliament intended to combat genetic discrimination by filling the gap in existing laws, which would place it in Parliament’s s. 91(27) power over criminal law, rather than the provincial legislatures’ s. 92(13) power over property and civil rights. [read post]
12 Jul 2020, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Resolved – IPSO mediation 02327-20 Lawson v The Gazette (Paisley), Resolved – IPSO mediation Last Week in the Courts On 6 July 2020 Saini J handed down judgment in the case of Spicer v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2020] EWHC 1778 (QB). [read post]
11 Jul 2020, 3:19 am by Jeanne Huang
Comments: Regarding substituted service, the Facebook judgment provides that[4] ‘[t]his Court has held, in circumstances analogous to the present, that an order for substituted service may be made under either r 10.24 or r 10.49 : Commissioner of Taxation v Zeitouni (2013) 306 ALR 603 at [60] (Katzmann J); see also: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kokos International Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 2035 at [18] (French J); Commissioner of Taxation… [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 12:15 pm by Unknown
Here are some resources for submitting comments for the former:- Asylum Seekers Have Power! [read post]