Search for: "Powers v. Commissioner"
Results 181 - 200
of 2,606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jun 2018, 2:32 am
In the instant case, the scheme is highly prescriptive, setting out narrowly-defined conditions for registration in the first place, including a record of tax compliance, and therefore the Court considered it wholly inconsistent with the tightly drawn scheme for there to be implied a general dispensing power. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 11:59 am
Prior Hawaii Supreme Court case law (Wilson v. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 4:06 pm
Powers of DPAs and Competence The ECJ emphasised that the Commission cannot limit the powers granted by the Data Protection Directive, but at the same time Commission decisions are binding and benefit from a presumption of legality. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 3:48 am
In a recent judgement in Delta Distilleries v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 8:08 pm
Mobley v. [read post]
12 Oct 2016, 12:12 pm
Yesterday, in PHH Corporation v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 6:21 am
” In State Farm v Privacy Commissioner, the State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. questioned the privacy commissioner’s jurisdiction to investigate a refusal to provide access to personal information and her power to compel the production of documents during the course of an investigation. [read post]
24 May 2020, 5:34 am
Davis and Helvering v. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm
In the case of David Miranda v Secretary of State for the Home Department, the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and three interveners ([2014] EWHC 255 (Admin)) the High Court rejected all the arguments supporting David Miranda’s application for judicial review of his detention at Heathrow Airport in August last year. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 6:06 am
And, it may also be important that judicial review of a refusal to authorise is no longer available following the decision of the Supreme Court in A, R (on the application of) v B [2009] UKSC 12 (summary here) but rather to the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 9:18 am
by Dennis Crouch Arthrex, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:07 am
R (on the application of GC) (FC) (Appellant) v The Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis – read judgment A declaration has been granted by a majority in the Supreme Court that police policy of DNA retention is unlawful because it is incompatible with article 8 of the ECHR. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 8:27 pm
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 7:20 am
National Labor Relations Board (08-1457), and Levin, Tax Commissioner of Ohio v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 3:17 pm
., where the Bureau does not have direct enforcement powers given the existence of legislation or regulations sanctioning conduct that would otherwise violate the Competition Act). [read post]
23 Dec 2008, 1:24 am
See Hawaii Insurers Council v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 9:30 pm
Edwards v Bairstow and Harrison (1955): Fact Finding and the Power of the CourtsAnne Fairpo9. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 9:30 pm
The court’s decision in the case of PHH Corporation v. [read post]
11 Nov 2021, 7:10 am
From the Court's per curiam opinion in Yovino v. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 7:21 am
However, judges do have some employment rights – see O’Brien cited above (and they probably also have the right not to be discriminated against under the Equality Act 2010, by analogy with P v Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis – [2017] UKSC 65 so the point is not at all obvious. [read post]
