Search for: "Powers v. Commissioner" Results 41 - 60 of 2,609
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2024, 6:00 am by Chile Eboe-Osuji
High Commissioner for Human Rights, and the current Chair of The Elders) disagreed. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 5:55 am by Tomaso Falchetta
Indeed, there is a disconnect between the crimes included in the draft treaty (Chapter II) and the scope of application of the powers to investigate crimes and to provide cooperation across jurisdictions (Chapters IV and V). [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 2:22 am by Eden Winlow (Bristows)
Dr Thaler responded by stating that the inventor was DABUS, acting autonomously and powered by AI, and that he acquired the right to the grant of the patents because he owned DABUS. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 1:34 am by Frank Cranmer
” The Court noted that s.41 of the Personal Information Protection Act prohibited the Commissioner and the Commissioner’s delegates from disclosing information obtained in performing their duties or exercising their powers except in very limited circumstances [137]. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:02 am by INFORRM
Read the Commissioner’s original response here and his updated response here. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 9:43 am by Dennis Crouch
  This argument is parallel to the ruling in Sonos v. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 2:48 pm by CFM Admin
December 18, 2023 Clients, Friends, and Associates: As we near the end of 2023, we have highlighted some recent industry developments that will likely impact many of our clients. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 6:09 am by Alden Abbott
Any actions to withdraw or amend Section 18 unfairness rules on the basis of cost-benefit analysis would require a majority vote of sitting commissioners. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 3:36 am by Cari Rincker
Commissioner,[2] dealt with a situation in which a father’s health began to worsen. [read post]