Search for: "Powers v. Commissioner" Results 81 - 100 of 1,929
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Mar 2019, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors, heard 3-4 Dec 2018. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 3:32 pm by Patricia Hughes
The House Justice Committee decides to hold a hearing and the ethics commissioner accepts a request to look into the matter. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors, heard 3-4 Dec 2018. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
The Panopticon Blog has a post two recent Upper Tribunal cases, Information Commissioner v Halpin [2019] UKUT 29 (AAC) and LO v Information Commissioner [2019] UKUT 34 (AAC). [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
Yet the Court struck down an injunction against such leafleting: No prior decisions support the claim that the interest of an individual in being free from public criticism of his business practices in pamphlets or leaflets warrants use of the injunctive power of a court. [read post]
25 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors, heard 3-4 Dec 2018. [read post]
24 Feb 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
The only permissible challenge is an allegation that Congress lacked the constitutional power to enact the legislation authorizing the taking.13 In Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm by admin
The only permissible challenge is an allegation that Congress lacked the constitutional power to enact the legislation authorizing the taking.13 In Hawaii Housing Authority v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
The jury in a condemnation proceeding was not bound by strict rules of evidence or normal civil trial procedures. 9 6  Const 1850, art 18, § 2 stated: When private property is taken for the use or benefit of the public, the necessity for using such property, and the just compensation to be made therefor, except when to be made by the state, shall be ascertained by a jury of twelve freeholders, residing in the vicinity of such property, or by not less than three commissioners,… [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
The jury in a condemnation proceeding was not bound by strict rules of evidence or normal civil trial procedures. 9 6  Const 1850, art 18, § 2 stated: When private property is taken for the use or benefit of the public, the necessity for using such property, and the just compensation to be made therefor, except when to be made by the state, shall be ascertained by a jury of twelve freeholders, residing in the vicinity of such property, or by not less than three commissioners,… [read post]
18 Feb 2019, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal & Ors, heard 3-4 Dec 2018. [read post]