Search for: "Powers v. Commissioner" Results 141 - 160 of 1,987
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2009, 5:53 am
 Fourth, the Supreme Court ruling in the TN Seshan v. [read post]
14 Jan 2014, 11:57 am by Christine Nielsen Czuprynski
The First Tier Tribunal (Information Rights) granted appeal against a monetary penalty notice of £300,000 issued by the Information Commissioner in the case of Christopher Niebel v The Information Commissioner (EA/2012/2060), ruling that the penalty notice should be cancelled. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:20 pm by mjpetro
The mayor "may appoint a person . . . to assist him in the exercise of the powers and the performance of the duties" as local liquor commissioner. [read post]
22 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
  While the Commissioner expressed that the FCC had little jurisdiction to do much on the Internet itself (but see our recent post as asking whether the FCC may soon get more power over the Internet), he felt that restrictions on the links to the Internet from television programs would be useful in protecting children. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 5:34 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Administrative Appeals Opinions Body: SC19362 - Kleen Energy Systems, LLC v. [read post]
29 Apr 2017, 4:56 pm by Patricia Salkin
Boomer v Waterman Family Limited Partnership, 155 A. 3d 901 (MD 3/2/2017)Filed under: Rezoning, Uncategorized [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
Non-tenured public administrator exercising policymaking or advisory duties ineligible for unemployment insurance Shapiro v Commissioner of Labor, 52 AD3d 1139 The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board held that the Village Administrator of the Village of Muttontown was ineligible to receive unemployment insurance benefits after determining that the Village Administrator was a major nontenured policymaking or advisory position within the meaning of Labor Law §565(2)(e). [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 11:21 pm by Patrick S. O'Donnell
When the spectacle was over, members of one of the most powerful regulatory agencies in the country had racked up a number of accomplishments. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 1:52 pm
If the firm with monopoly or near-monopoly power (here, allegedly Intel) engages in an exclusionary and unjustifiable course of conduct that hurts its only competitor in the CPU markets (here, allegedly AMD) or its only two competitors in the computer graphics product markets (here, allegedly AMD and Nvidia), given the uncommonly high entry barriers, that exclusionary conduct harms competition too, by inhibiting those rivals from constraining the exercise of monopoly power. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 7:59 am by Doug Cornelius
The trouble is that the President has no power to remove the Commissioners of the SEC, other than the Chair. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 8:56 pm
However, when vast powers are exercised by an institution which is accountable to none, it is politic to entrust its affairs to more hands than one. [read post]
16 Apr 2015, 3:56 am by Rosalind English
Judge Jacobs found that this was in fact a challenge to the reasoning of the Upper Tribunal in Smartsource Drainage and Water Reports Ltd v the Information Commissioner and a Group of 19 Water Companies [2010] UKUT 415 (AAC), which decided that they were not. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 9:23 am by Cadwalader
By Kenneth Irvin, Gregory Lawrence, Sohair Aguirre and Natalie Mitchell There have been several notable developments in the Electric Power Supply Ass’n v. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 3:35 am by sally
Flavell Consultants Ltd v Uddin [2014] EWCA Civ 902 (03 July 2014) Power v Meloy Whittle Robinson Solicitors [2014] EWCA Civ 898 (02 July 2014) Malone v Relyon Heating Engineering Ltd [2014] EWCA Civ 904 (02 July 2014) Youssefi v Mussellwhite [2014] EWCA Civ 885 (02 July 2014) Hone & Ors v Abbey Forwarding & Anor [2014] EWCA Civ 899 (02 July 2014) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Dil & Ors v… [read post]
30 Jan 2016, 10:30 am by Robert Thomas (
Commissioner of Highways (Virginia, 2015) (jury gets to hear about condemnor's earlier -- and higher -- appraisal) (via Jeremy Hopking) Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. [read post]