Search for: "Powers v. Hatcher"
Results 1 - 14
of 14
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Dec 2008, 11:48 am
State v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 7:04 pm
The 55-page ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 4:48 pm
On 21 February 2020 the Administrative Court handed down judgment in Short v The Falkland Islands [2020] EWHC 439 (Admin), dealing with the Court’s power to anonymise an individual subject to extradition proceedings for an alleged sexual offence. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 7:16 am
Hatcher and related opinions from the U.S. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 4:19 am
By chance today I read an interesting article in the current edition of the Society for Computers & Law journal on Bilski v Kappos by Dr Robert Harrison and Jordan S Hatcher, in which they suggest that companies build defensive IP portfolios to use when faced with a challenge of patent infringement from a competitor -- to cross-license or cross-sue. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
GUADALUPE ADRIANA MARTINEZ, BRYAN POWERS, AND LEMUEL LOPEZ; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00386-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 03-08-07)07-0842 VICTOR HADDAD, M.D. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2022, 2:51 pm
Kendra Hatcher. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
Hatcher and related opinions from the U.S. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:24 am
’ (China Law Blog) Europe ECJ finds similar marks on wine and glasses not likely to cause confusion: Waterford Wedgewood plc v Assembled Investments (Proprietary) Ltd, OHIM (Class 46) (IPKat) AG Colomer opines in Maple leaf trade mark battle: joined cases American Clothing Associates SA v OHIM and OHIM v American Clothing Associates SA (IPKat) (Excess Copyright) CFI: Restitutio and time limits: how does the law stand now for CTMs? [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 3:57 pm
Hook v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Supreme Court to reconsider in light of Carey v. [read post]
29 Feb 2024, 7:15 pm
Hatcher, Injustice, Inc. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am
National/Federal A Right-Wing Think Tank Claimed to Be a Church. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 10:23 am
Part V addresses Miller and Tucker's claim that the American Founders were unfamiliar with dramatic technological changes in firearms — a claim that is refuted by Dupuy's data. [read post]
