Search for: "Powers v. Ohio"
Results 161 - 180
of 2,164
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 May 2012, 7:49 pm
Wickard v. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 4:48 am
On July 9, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Irene Danopulos v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 10:07 am
"Mendenhall v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 6:40 am
” Did the Ohio Supreme Court reverse itself in Moore v. [read post]
30 Sep 2015, 3:45 pm
On September 16, 2015, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 7:47 am
On July 13, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of Foley v. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 6:28 am
On March 11, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Carlos Sivit, et al., v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 1:16 pm
My last post pointed to a Columbus Bar Association press release about Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 9:54 am
(The case is Noel Canning v. [read post]
4 Jul 2009, 4:50 pm
” City of Norwood v. [read post]
28 Apr 2016, 6:53 am
On April 20, 2016, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
27 Aug 2018, 6:40 am
On August 1, 2018, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case Ann Wayt v. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 7:08 am
On September 23, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of Hope Academy Broadway Campus, et. al. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
No. 14-07-47, 2008-Ohio-1484 (separation of powers, retroactivity, double jeopardy, ex post facto) State v. [read post]
20 May 2014, 9:12 am
Co., 2010-Ohio-1027, and Stetter v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
On December 18, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio handed down a merit decision in Pixley v. [read post]
27 Oct 2014, 7:19 am
Assuming that the northeastern states support the Clean Power Plan, it sets up a sort of "Blue v. [read post]
1 Feb 2008, 6:12 am
In Mendenhall v. [read post]
5 Sep 2018, 1:39 pm
V., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 8:43 am
It’s conceivable that the Court could impose new limits on Congress’s Elections Clause powers in Arizona v. [read post]
