Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 35,986
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2019, 8:38 pm
United States Could Signal a Major Change in the Supreme Court’s Separation of Powers Jurisprudence”: Peter J. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 12:12 am
Supreme Court’s American Electric Power v. [read post]
17 Jan 2025, 8:00 am
United States and the Half-Originalist Presidency, which is forthcoming in the University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform:The Court's recent decision in Trump v. [read post]
27 Jun 2019, 9:46 am
Kisor v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 2:27 pm
Zinke, which will address the separation-of-powers principles stemming from United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 9:30 pm
United States (U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:25 am
Regina (Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and Another) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Court of Appeal “Proposals to replace two-tier local government in some parts of the country with unitary authorities, made before the necessary statutory powers were in place, were lawful as long as genuine reconsideration had been given to them after the commencement of the relevant Act. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 3:18 am
Courts cannot judge specialist policy Regina (Legal Remedy UK Ltd) v. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 3:43 pm
Opinions states what the law is - but the petitions often foreshadow what the laws are likely to be in the future. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 2:43 pm
Georgia (1831) and Worcester v. [read post]
19 May 2021, 7:19 am
United States—then a case like Johnson v. [read post]
16 Dec 2023, 6:34 am
Co. v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
24 Feb 2021, 3:13 am
Defendant’s failure to lodge a timely, specific objection to the billing was insufficient to rebut any inference of an agreement to pay the stated amount (see Shaw v Silver, 95 AD3d 416 [1st Dept 2012]). [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 8:42 am
Bond Topple Missouri V. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 6:27 am
The issue in United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2016, 9:47 pm
. , v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 1:41 pm
Harper… Continue reading The post Some thoughts on state power to conduct presidential primaries (and why the Moore v. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 2:03 pm
Harper, the case testing whether a state legislature has plenary power over federal elections in the state, unconstrained by state courts. [read post]