Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 181 - 200
of 36,309
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2025, 6:31 am
[1] Under Chevron v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 6:31 am
[1] Under Chevron v. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 5:00 am
That’s one powerful opinion piece. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
The Court first held that the reliance by the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals (OCCA) on the state's Post-Conviction Procedures Act (PCPA) to bar Glossip's effort to have his conviction reversed was not an independent state law ground that deprives SCOTUS of the power to review the decision because the OCCA's PCPA ruling was itself based on an evaluation of the strength of Glossip's underlying federal claims. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 3:12 am
Those in power must be listening. [read post]
28 Feb 2025, 1:51 am
Turning to the interpretation of these autonomous criteria under Article 25, the Court confirmed the validity of asymmetric jurisdiction clauses designating courts of EU Member States or States that are parties to the Lugano Convention. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:24 pm
A dozen years before Congress proposed the Twenty-Second Amendment, the Supreme Court decided Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 2:15 pm
[That's the powerful argument that Mayor Adams's lawyers are making, citing (among other grounds) the leaking of a resignation letter containing "the wildly inflammatory and false accusation that Mayor Adams and his counsel had, in essence, offered a quid to the Department of Justice in exchange for the quo of dismissal. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 12:53 pm
Gartenberg argues that under Healy v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 10:04 am
The court stated that the City’s conduct in this regard was inimical to the rule of law and constituted a failure by the City to discharge its constitutional obligations. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 5:48 am
The legal issue in Holtzman v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 4:05 am
In Barnett v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
In Jensen v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:30 am
Justice Scalia questioned Congressional efforts to limit executive power in this fashion in his dissent from the SCOTUS’s 1988 decision in Morrison v. [read post]
27 Feb 2025, 3:15 am
See Reed, 576 U.S. at 163; AAPC, 591 U.S. at 618 (plurality opinion); United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:05 pm
Musk[3] (striking Elon Musk’s $56 billion pay package at Tesla), West Palm Beach Firefighters’ Pension Fund v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:36 pm
Nonetheless, given the “vast power” of the administrative state, the digital platforms did not sue the government for violating their First Amendment rights, apparently believing that it just wasn’t worth it to fight City Hall (hence the problem of the petitioners’ lack of standing in Murthy). [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 9:04 am
United States Cellular Operating Company, LLC v Town of Fond Du Lac, 2025 WL 472421 (WI App. 2/12/2025) [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 4:00 am
This practice of "red-lining" led to segregated neighborhoods which, even post-Brown v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 12:30 am
However, that power may only be used by the Court of Appeal if it is not already bound by the retained EU case law. [read post]
