Search for: "Powers v. State" Results 21 - 40 of 36,566
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2025, 1:17 pm by NARF
(Discrimination; Standing; Testers) United States of America, et al. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 12:33 pm by Neil Cahn
Nonetheless, the fiction is not applied when recognizing that a tenant by the entirety has the power to mortgage their interest. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 7:45 am by Evan George
Bill McKibben writes that “perhaps the world’s greatest environmental champion is dead,” noting that the pope understood the crisis as one about power and human dignity. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 7:16 am by Mikolaj Barczentewicz
The Commission’s announcement explicitly stated that Meta’s model “did not allow users to exercise their right to freely consent. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, Respondent.Calendar Date: February 10, 2025Before: Aarons, J.P., Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and Powers, JJ.Creighton, Johnsen & Giroux, Buffalo (Jonathan G. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
DiNapoli, as State Comptroller, Respondent.Calendar Date: February 10, 2025Before: Aarons, J.P., Pritzker, Reynolds Fitzgerald, Ceresia and Powers, JJ.Creighton, Johnsen & Giroux, Buffalo (Jonathan G. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 4:22 am by Sam Coldicutt
The law could state that trustees, when exercising their investment powers, are not deemed to have breached their fiduciary duties merely because they consider the economic impact on the UK or any part of it. [read post]
23 Apr 2025, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The Solicitor General argues that the law limiting the president's power to remove NLRB members is unconstitutional, urging an extremely narrow role for Humphrey's Executor v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:53 am by Bruce Zagaris
From the DOJ’s positions in the various cases, the administration’s public statements, and the decisions of the several courts, the separation of powers is experiencing a historical tension. [1]  A.A.R.P., et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:53 am by Bruce Zagaris
From the DOJ’s positions in the various cases, the administration’s public statements, and the decisions of the several courts, the separation of powers is experiencing a historical tension. [1]  A.A.R.P., et al. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 6:47 am by INFORRM
  The Court of Appeal in the ABC v Telegraph Media judgment which led to the grant of the injunction balanced the relevant public interests. [read post]
22 Apr 2025, 5:50 am by Tamar Luster
This interpretation explicitly aligns with Israel’s stance in its submissions before the Israeli Supreme Court (as well as before the ICJ in the South Africa v. [read post]