Search for: "Powers v. State" Results 61 - 80 of 41,065
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jul 2024, 12:23 pm by bklemm@foley.com
EPA, states that, if congressional intent indicates that an agency should have discretionary power over an issue, then the court must consider whether the agency has engaged in “reasoned decision making. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am by Offit Kurman
Historically, the FTC has disclaimed such power, but Congress has not expressly granted it. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Twitter * Second Circuit Issues Powerful Section 230 Win to Facebook in “Material Support for Terrorists” Case–Force v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 8:50 am by Natalia Arno
The documents included: A denunciation to the Prosecutor General’s Office from Nikolai Ryzhkov, a career security officer and State Duma deputy who has been under U.S. sanctions since Russia’s 2014 invasion of Ukraine. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 7:35 am
United States [quoting the McDonnell case].In the McDonnell case, Roberts found that prosecutors had defined “official acts” too broadly; in the Trump decision, he took the position that prosecutors had considered the question too narrowly. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:55 am by Dennis Crouch
If you recall 1L civil procedure, the issue here whether the out-of-state patentee’s enforcement actions were sufficiently directed toward the state of Utah such that due process and  the notion of “fair play” would permit a Federal Court sitting in Utah to exert power over the patentee. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
 Appeal of M.A., 61 Ed Dept Rep, Decision No. 18,070 [citing Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122 (1999), which states that “mere denial of receipt” is insufficient to rebut a presumption of service]). [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 3:59 am by SHG
” Brief for United States as Amicus Curiae 25. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 10:30 pm by Malcolm Birdling
The second prompt is the General Court’s recent decision in Case T-426/21 Nizar Assaad v Council ECLI:EU:T:2023:114. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 11:28 am
Human collectives (collectives that are ideological and normative, as well as techno-bureaucratic, both of which are well marbled across the range of human collectives with power or influence over state, enterprise, civil, and academic organs and their systems) with regulatory power or influence tend to speak about platforms as regulatory spaces in and through which collectives consume and produce regulation. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:15 am by Stephen Bilkis
This means the defendant was acting in an official capacity or using power given to them by the state. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 8:00 am by Josh Blackman
" Nothing in the decision called into question the "broad power" of States to regulate acts undertaken with some mens rea. [read post]