Search for: "Powers v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 36,573
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Apr 2025, 2:46 am
If the government is confident of its position, it should be assured that position will prevail in proceedings to terminate the withholding of removal order… Today, both the United States and the El Salvadoran governments disclaim any authority and/or responsibility to return Abrego Garcia…We are told that neither government has the power to act. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 2:17 pm
In the coming weeks, the court is poised to issue a major ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 2:17 pm
In the coming weeks, the court is poised to issue a major ruling in United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 10:32 am
I see an analogy to United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 6:56 am
Central to FCC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:50 am
Elk v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 5:41 am
ContemptLet's start with Judge Boasberg's opinion in J.G.G. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 3:44 am
Purkayastha v. [read post]
18 Apr 2025, 3:30 am
Ogden for Congress’s power over interstate commerce; Dred Scott (and maybe Prigg v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court 30 years ago in Babbitt v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 3:26 pm
In my view, courts lack the power to solve all problems. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 1:34 pm
Apr. 10, 2025); see also United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 1:02 pm
Abrego Garcia v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 12:11 pm
Supreme Court’s 1966 decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 11:51 am
” It was intended to overrule one of the Supreme Court’s most infamous decisions, its 1857 ruling in Dred Scott v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 9:46 am
Howard Phillips Lovecraft was born in 1892, nineteen years after the enactment of the Comstock Act and six years before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 9:44 am
Howard Phillips Lovecraft was born in 1892, nineteen years after the enactment of the Comstock Act and six years before the Supreme Court in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2025, 9:00 am
ME); State of Colorado v HHS (D.R.I.); Widakuswara v. [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 9:05 pm
In Humphrey’s Executor v. [read post]
16 Apr 2025, 2:18 pm
If not, they might still be able to get standing based on more indirect harms (e.g. - the state having to pay higher prices for goods purchased from contractors), or based on the "special solicitude" on standing extended to state governments in the Supreme Court's ruling in Massachusetts v. [read post]
