Search for: "Powers v. State" Results 81 - 100 of 32,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2018, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
North Dakota, “that a State may not require out-of-state sellers of goods or services to collect that State’s sales/use tax, unless the out-of-state seller has some ‘physical presence’ in the State – a retail outlet, warehouse, office, or the like” This term’s case of South Dakota v. [read post]
6 Dec 2018, 5:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The post How a Frog Habitat in Louisiana May Begin to Curb Administrative Agency Power in Weyerhaeuser Company v United States Fish and Wildlife Service appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:38 pm by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
states Justice Gorsuch in his concurring opinion in Sessions v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:05 pm by Elizabeth McElvein
The state Supreme Court held in Attorney General v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 7:24 am by Coplan, Prof. Karl S.
At least four justices thus seem ready to revisit the broad standing recognized for States in Massachusetts v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
On 19 January 2016 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (on application of Miranda) v Secretary of State for the Home Department ([2016] EWCA Civ 6). [read post]
10 May 2011, 10:37 am by Curtis Bradley
The Supreme Court recently granted review in a case, Zivotofsky v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 10:29 am by Rick Pildes
As I've noted here before, in early December the Supreme Court is going to engage one of the most important cases of the Term, Free Enterprise Fund v. [read post]
9 Jul 2008, 11:58 pm
My tentative assessment is that the Court has gutted the states' spending powers Exhibit A for this thesis is a comparison between the Court's opinion in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 1:33 pm
Defendant argues that the Supremacy Clause acts as an absolute bar to state courts' authority to exercise jurisdiction over a sitting President, citing McCulloch v Maryland... which held that 'the states have no power, by taxation or otherwise, to retard, impede, burden, or in any manner control, the operations of the constitutional laws enacted by congress to carry into execution the powers vested in the general government.'... [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 3:03 pm by Mary L. Dudziak
Although he does not make a Commerce Power argument, it is also the case that the broadest uses of the Commerce Power upheld by the Supreme Court (Katzenbach v. [read post]