Search for: "Pratheepan Gulasekaram"
Results 41 - 59
of 59
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2019, 3:58 am
Briefly: Pratheepan Gulasekaram analyzes Wednesday’s oral argument in Kansas v. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 3:55 am
Pratheepan Gulasekaram previewed the case for this blog. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 2:50 pm
In a just released ACS Issue Brief, Pratheepan Gulasekaram and S. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 4:29 pm
Pratheepan Gulasekaram is a professor of law at Santa Clara University. [read post]
26 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
Santa Clara Pratheepan Gulasekaram (Santa Clara Law) Toronto Law and Economics Ryan Bubb (NYU Law) presents “States, Law, and the Property Rights in West Africa. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 11:17 am
In an ACS Issue Brief, Pratheepan Gulasekaram, a Santa Clara University law school professor, explains why the Supreme Court’s narrow opinion in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 9:38 am
” Santa Clara University law professor Pratheepan Gulasekaram explains the federal government’s dominance in the field of immigration law and policy in her American Constitution Society Issue Brief, “No Exception to the Rule: The Unconstitutionality of State Immigration Enforcement Laws. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 7:20 pm
Pratheepan Gulasekaram (Santa Clara Law) and Karthick Ramakrishnan (UC Riverside poli sci) have an op-ed in the LA Times contending that SB1070 and its siblings are the product of partisan politics, and one of them has a post on the ACS blog. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 12:49 pm
” In an ACS Issue Brief released this week, law professor Pratheepan Gulasekaram says supporters and opponents of strict immigration state laws, such as Arizona’s, do agree that “U.S. immigration policy needs fixing. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 6:39 am
Other commentary on the case comes from Ilya Shapiro of Cato@Liberty, Jacob Sullum of Reason, Natasha Rivera-Silber and Jordan Wells at ImmigrationProf Blog, and Pratheepan Gulasekaram at ACSblog. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 6:30 am
For the Symposium on Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez, The President and Immigration Law (Oxford University Press, 2020).Pratheepan Gulasekaram In The President and Immigration Law, Adam Cox and Cristina Rodriguez provide a compelling historical and contemporary account of the centrality of the president to immigration law. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:55 am
” Other commentary comes from Pratheepan Gulasekaram and Letitia Saucedo at ACSblog, and from Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg. [read post]
13 Jun 2016, 2:57 am
” At Notice and Comment, David Rubinstein and Pratheepan Gulasekaram discuss United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 5:07 pm
"He has already lived, been educated and successfully passed the bar exam in California," said Pratheepan Gulasekaram, a Santa Clara University law professor who specializes in immigration law. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 4:30 am
Commentary comes from Anil Kalhan at Dorf on Law, Jeff Chang at Slate, and Pratheepan Gulasekaram and Karthick Ramakrishnan at The Washington Post’s Monkey Cage. [read post]
8 Nov 2018, 9:30 pm
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK Sanctuary efforts for undocumented immigrants are “evolving” in parallel with the anti-sanctuary movement, wrote Professor Rose Cuison Villazor of Rutgers University School of Law and Professor Pratheepan Gulasekaram of Santa Clara University School of Law in a forthcoming article for the UC Davis Law Review. [read post]
5 Mar 2020, 3:51 am
Briefly: Pratheepan Gulasekaram analyzes the court’s opinion in Kansas v. [read post]
29 Jun 2016, 12:36 pm
Texas, the challenge to the Obama administration’s deferred-action policy for certain undocumented immigrants, comes from Melissa Kearney, who at Medium argues that the ruling “failed millions of immigrant families”; and from Karthick Ramakrishnan and Pratheepan Gulasekaram, who in an op-ed for Los Angeles Times contend that “evidence from the last decade has shown the limits of an immigration reform strategy that is fixated on the federal government. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 11:29 am
As I have written at length elsewhere (with Pratheepan Gulasekaram), the court’s reasons matter. [read post]
