Search for: "Prather v. AT&T"
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
Breaking News: The SG has asked for an extension of time in which to file a cert petition in Prather
16 Jun 2011, 8:09 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:33 pm
Prather, 69 M.J. 338 (C.A.A.F. 2011) and United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 2:03 pm
Prather for inter-service review. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 8:41 am
The deadline for either a cert petition or request for additional time to file a cert petition in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 7:40 am
To the best of my knowledge, the SG didn’t request a second extension. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 11:41 am
Jul. 22, 2013) and Prather v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 1:37 pm
Today's opinion lists "Kathleen M. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 7:22 am
In the wake of last week’s blockbuster Prather opinion, we all now await CAAF’s decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:34 am
The case, United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 6:52 pm
U.S. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:01 am
Prather, and United States v. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 10:57 am
Prather v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 9:30 am
Prather, 205 F.3d 1265, 1270 (11th Cir.2000) ("[T]he jury thus needed to find either that he knew the pseudoephedrine would be used to manufacture methamphetamine or that he had reasonable cause to believe that it would be. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 1:01 pm
Id. at *45-46.But we don’t want just to discuss yucky cases, so we’re bookending Block with another pain pump decision, Prather v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Unless CAAF issues an unexpected opinion of the court in a case that hasn’t been orally argued (which, though unlikely, is possible; see, e.g., United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 10:14 pm
Prather and the new, new Art 120, UCMJ. [read post]
United States v. Fosler: CAAF holds Article 134 adultery sample specification fails to state offense
8 Aug 2011, 11:53 pm
Remember Prather? [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:26 am
Prather. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 6:57 am
Ron, No. 20100599, will be argued on Thursday, February 23, and is a Prather trailer: I. [read post]
6 May 2016, 12:30 pm
April 12, 2016), held – almost as a throw-away point – that Texas law wouldn’t apply Restatement (Second) of Torts §402A, comment k (1965) to medical devices as it does to prescription drugs. [read post]
